Lou’s Views
“Unofficial” Minutes & Comments
BOC’s Special Meeting 10/03/24
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet » click here
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet II » click here
Audio Recording » click here
1. Discussion and Possible Action on Proposed Changes to the Pier Request for Qualifications – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Paarfus
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Direct Town staff to develop an RFP to accomplish tasks 1 and 2 of the recently adopted Pier Property Development Plan. The RFP should also accomplish task 4 as it applies to the pier only. Once developed, it should be presented to the Board for approval prior to issuance.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The RFP should provide preliminary design information and budgetary (class 3) cost estimates for the four (4) phases to repair the pier and the two (2) phases to replace the pier as outlined in the plan. Life cycle Operating and Maintenance costs for both pier repair and pier replacement are to be developed as well.
Pier Property Development Plan » click here
Previously reported – May 2024
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Direct Town Staff to develop an RFP to accomplish tasks 1 and 2 of the recently adopted Pier Property Development Plan. The RFP should also accomplish task 4 as it applies to the pier only. Once developed, it should be presented to the Board for approval prior to issuance.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The RFP should provide preliminary design information and budgetary (class 3) cost estimates for the four (4) phases to repair the pier and the two (2) phases to replace the pier as outlined in the plan. Life cycle Operating and Maintenance costs for both pier repair and pier replacement are to be developed as well.
Task 1 –
Initiate preliminary design work for repair of the current pier from the deck (in phases similar to that outlined above), to include cost estimates for each phase and a draft Maintenance and Repair Plan with yearly cost estimates.
Task 2 –
Initiate preliminary design and cost estimates for a new wooden pier (in phases as outlined above), to include cost estimates for each phase and a draft Maintenance and Repair Plan with yearly cost estimates.
Task 3 –
Initiate preliminary land site wide conceptual design(s) that comply with PARTF requirements to include initial cost estimates for construction, operation, and maintenance.
Task 4 –
Conduct a financial/business case analysis should be performed to determine potential revenue that can offset the development costs. This should include some type of market analysis of any potential commercial/retail facilities that may be on the site.
The Board expressed their desire to move this project forward. The motion was made to have Town staff develop a Request for Proposals to accomplish tasks in the recently adopted Pier Property Development Plan. They requested that the RFP be presented to the Board for approval prior to it being distributed.
A request for proposal (RFP) is a solicitation, often made through a bidding process, by an agency or company interested in procurement of a commodity, service, or valuable asset, to potential suppliers to submit business proposals
Previously reported – August 2024
The original tasker was just for the pier not the entire pier property, The Board had asked for a Request for Proposal (RFP) but David informed them they will need to do a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) instead.
The RFP of professional services is prohibited by the Mini-Brooks Act (G.S. 143-64.31). Staff is working through a Statement of Work (SOW) which is the development of the projects requirements. Professionals responding to the RFP will be selected solely based on their qualifications and not on price. Once a firm is selected the Town will negotiate a contract for the desired services. A question was raised regarding a public/private partnership option, they were informed that they will need to decide to repair or replace the pier before they can move forward with exploring that option.
Update –
Commissioner Paarfus objected to some of the verbiage and had a number of recommendations that he wants to discuss with the other Commissioners. He directed the Town Clerk to poll the Board for their availability and to hold a Special Meeting before October 7th to discuss an Engineering, Design and Financial Services Request for Qualifications. They would like to have consensus on the RFQ so that it could be voted on at the next BOC’s Regular meeting in October.
Previously reported – September 2024
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Board Review, Approve and Direct Issuance of Engineering, Design and Financial Services Request for Qualifications
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Attached Request for Qualifications (RFQ) has been drafted in accordance with formal Board tasker of 21 May 2024 and subsequently modified by consensus at the August 2024 regular Board meeting to develop for Board review prior to issuance of a RFQ necessary to select firm(s) to provide preliminary design and budgetary information in accordance with the Pier Development Plan approved by the Board of Commissioners 30 April 2024.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Board receive/review and issue RFQ necessary to select firm(s) to provide preliminary design and budgetary information subject to follow on negotiated services agreement per the Mini-Brooks Act.
The Town of Holden Beach (“Town”) is seeking qualified providers of Engineering, Design and Financial services to develop Level 3 estimates that will enable the Town to make repair or rebuild decisions regarding its Pier Complex located at 441 Ocean Boulevard West, Holden Beach NC.
Commissioner Paarfus objected to some of the verbiage and had a number of recommendations that he wants to discuss with the other Commissioners. He directed the Town Clerk to poll the Board for their availability and to hold a special meeting before October 7th to discuss an Engineering, Design and Financial Services Request for Qualifications. They would like to have a consensus on the RFQ so that it could be voted on at the next BOC’s Regular meeting in October.
Update –
The reason for this meeting was for the BOC’s to look at the pier RFQ, agree to the proposed changes and then move the pier project forward. The motion made was to incorporate the changes as discussed and get this RFQ issued.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
THB Newsletter (10/13/24)
Town of Holden Beach Request for Qualifications
Pier Complex, 441 Ocean Boulevard West
The Town of Holden Beach is seeking qualified providers of Engineering, Design and Financial services to develop Class 3 estimates that will enable the Town to make repair or rebuild decisions regarding its Pier Complex located at 441 Ocean Boulevard West, Holden Beach NC. To qualify, interested firms should have multi-faceted experience working with marine/waterfront public facility projects. Firms interested in submitting a Statement of Qualifications may review the Request for Qualifications package found on our website at https://hbtownhall.com/.
All interested firms that have questions must direct them to the Town Clerk Heather Finnell via email no later than 11 November 2024. Any addendums will be released with answers to submitted questions with posting on the Town’s website at https://www.hbtownhall.com.
Interested firms must electronically submit their qualifications package as a PDF document by no later than 25 November, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. to Heather Finnell, Town Clerk; [email protected]. Paper copies are not required. If a hard copy is submitted, eight (8) copies shall be delivered to the Holden Beach Town Hall located at 110 Rothschild Street, Holden Beach NC 28462 prior to the submission deadline. Whether digital or hard copy, the subject line should contain the firm’s name and “Statement of Qualifications for Development of Preliminary Designs and Cost Estimates for 441 Ocean Boulevard West”
What to know as plans to restore this BC fishing pier inch forward
Evening walks on the pier and afternoon fishing trips are classic parts of any beach trip. This year, however, marks the second summer in a row that Holden Beach visitors and residents have missed out on those memories. The Holden Beach Fishing Pier has been closed to the public since 2022, after the town purchased the pier and pier house property for around $3.3 million – without plans in place for its future. The Holden Beach Board of Commissioners got to work assessing the pier’s existing structural issues and forming a conceptual plan to renovate the property. After approving a final site plan for the property in February 2023, new board members were elected in November 2023. In December, the board was set to act on bids received for the renovation project. Instead, the board paused the project to allow the new board members to get caught up on its status and scope.
Here’s where things stand now.
Project slowly moving forward again
Earlier this year, a public input session was held to allow the public to review plans for the pier and offer their thoughts. Following that meeting, the town’s board of commissioners is inching forward with the project once again. In April, the board approved a pier property development plan to serve as a “baseline approach” and “starting point” for the development. That plan notes the repairs to the existing structure will likely need to occur in phases as funding is available. The plan suggests those phases would be to stabilize the existing structure, complete safety repairs, complete remaining repairs and extend the pier, in that order. The adopted plan also notes that, due to cost, the pier would likely be replaced with a new wood pier, rather than a concrete pier. “Although a concrete pier is preferred, it may not be financially supportable for a small tax base like Holden Beach,” the document states. Additionally, the plan notes that funding for a pier replacement would likely require financing through a loan or bond.
What’s next?
In May, the board voted to direct staff to develop a request for proposals (RFP) to move forward with accomplishing the first few tasks outlined in the pier property development plan: Preliminary design and receiving cost estimates for the repair or replacement of the pier.
Read more » click here
With a ‘baseline’ approach, a Brunswick town takes next step to reopen its pier
Long walks on the Holden Beach Fishing Pier and making new memories could be on the horizon for residents and visitors after two years of waiting and questioning the pier’s future. Holden Beach officials are inching toward a plan for the pier, whether it’s replacing or refurbishing the nearly 70-year-old structure. The town of Holden Beach will be seeking qualifications from firms to develop preliminary designs and cost estimates to both repair and replace the town’s beloved fishing pier at 441 Ocean Blvd. West. “The pier is 65 years old and is in need of significant repair or replacement,” the request for qualifications (RFQ) states. Commissioners and residents have questioned the pier’s future since 2022, after the town purchased the pier and pier house property for around $3.3 million. The pier and pier house have since been closed to the public. The board this year has mulled over what to do – repair or rebuild.
Here’s a recap and update on what’s been happening.
Residents miss the pier being open
After the closure of the structure, the town has tried to move forward with structure designs but have often fallen short. Earlier this year the town gathered public input on a conceptual plan and commissioners have continued to hear residents pleas to work together and develop an action plan to open the pier as soon as possible.
Town moves onward
On Oct. 3, commissioners took a step closer to finding out what is best by approving RFQ be issued for engineering, design and financial services. The RFQ provides expectations of the project and allows firms to submit information about their team, experience and ability to do the project. Town Manager David Hewett said publishing an RFQ does not put the town in a contractual obligation. “We’re just fishing, we’re not committing,” Commissioner Rick Paarfus said.
Future plans and expectations
Commissioners in late April accepted Paarfus’ “baseline” approach pier project plan. It has been said several times that the plan is a starting point to set the town on track with a vision for the pier property. The chosen firm, if one is selected, is to accomplish the first few tasks outlined in the pier project development plan. This includes two preliminary designs: repairing the pier and building a new, wooden pier. Repairing the pier, per the plan, will require stabilizing the existing structure and completing safety repairs. Both designs are to be phased and encompass plans to extend the pier from 750 feet to 1,000 feet in length and draft a maintenance and repair plan with annual lifecycle cost estimates. More information on the plan and the pier can be found on the town of Holden Beach’s website.
Read more » click here
BOC’s Regular Meeting 10/15/24
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet » click here
Audio Recording » click here
1. Conflict of Interest Check
2024 Rules of Procedure for the Holden Beach Board of Commissioners
(e) Conflict Check. Immediately after the approval of the agenda, the Presiding Officer shall poll each member to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. In the event that a potential conflict is disclosed, the members will vote on a motion to allow or excuse that member with respect to the agenda item. If excused, the member may not participate in any discussion, debate, or vote with respect to the agenda item.
The Board was polled by Heather our Town Clerk. All of them declared that there was no conflict of interest with any agenda item at this meeting.
2. Recognition from the National Weather Service that the Town is Storm Ready/Tsunami Ready – Inspections Director Evans
Agenda Packet – page 9
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Recognition that the Town is now Storm Ready/Tsunami Ready
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Recognition from National Weather Service that the Town is now Storm Ready/Tsunami Ready
StormReady is an NWS program that started in 1999 to help communities with the communication and safety skills needed to save lives and property during severe weather.
The NWS Wilmington, NC Forecast Office works with local government/military officials and other community groups across southeast NC and northeast SC to help them better prepare for severe weather through education and awareness. If you’re interested in applying for the program, click here. However, even if you don’t qualify for the program you can still become a StormReady Supporter.
Tsunami Ready is a similar program that helps coastal communities minimize the risk specifically posed by tsunamis. If you’re interested in applying for this program, click here. You can also consider becoming a TsunamiReady Supporter.
Update –
Representative Steve Pfaff from the National Weather Service recognized the Town for being Storm Ready/Tsunami Ready. Steve stated that the three pieces of the program are partnership, planning, and preparedness. Recognition was given to all members of the Planning and Inspections Department. He presented a certificate to the Town, followed by a photo-op. Timbo made sure that we recognized staff member Janna Pigott for her efforts in getting us ready, he stated that now we are prepared. In addition, this helps us meet the goals of the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from the community actions.
3. Discussion and Possible Action on the Results of the Town of Holden Beach 2024 Pavement Condition Survey – Shane Lippard, Right Angle Engineering (Public Works Director Clemmons)
Agenda Packet – page 10, plus separate packet
Pavement Condition Survey » click here
ISSUE/ ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on the Results of the Town of Holden Beach 2024 Pavement Condition Survey Update
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
This is an update to the Pavement Condition Plan that was established in 2008. Since the plan was implemented, approximately $1.5 million in improvements have been completed. It updates the priority and pricing
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
Analysis of the Results of the 2024 Pavement Condition Survey
Executive Summary
This report presents the results from a Pavement Condition Survey and analyzes the maintenance needs for the Town of Holden Beach’s street system. Right Angle Engineering, Inc. conducted a visual survey of the public (non-State maintained) streets that are maintained by the Town of Holden Beach. The results from this survey were used to determine maintenance needs and estimate their costs.Recommended maintenance activities for the street system are presented in Appendix B. A priority listing, provided in Appendix C, is based on Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR’s). The priority listing does not account for high volume or low volume streets. Streets are categorized by the Town as either low (Class A) or high (Class B) volume streets. Certain Class A or Class B streets may have higher or lower importance for the Town based upon the number of dwelling units served, commercial traffic using the street, or projected land development and traffic growth. Based on field observations, it is assumed that the streets surveyed would be considered Class A streets. We do not anticipate that there are any Class B streets maintained by the Town of Holden Beach at this time.
A. Street Inventory
The Town-maintained street system consists of approximately 12.8 miles of total paved asphalt roadway. As previously mentioned, all of the subject streets are Class A (low volume) roads. Approximately 1.6% of the streets have sidewalk along one side only, while none of the streets have sidewalks on both sides. We did not observe any streets with curb and gutters. AU of the Town-maintained paved streets have an asphalt surface.
B. Pavement Condition
The two primary distress types that require maintenance are alligator cracking and patching. Over 66% of the street system exhibits some degree of alligator cracking while approximately 6% of the system requires some asphalt patching. Some areas of light block/transverse cracking, reflective cracking, rutting, raveling, and bleeding were noted. In addition, the ride quality of some areas was observed to be slightly rough.
C. Maintenance Needs
Of the 12.8 miles of streets inspected, approximately 25% are in need of maintenance. The survey indicated a total estimated maintenance need for plant mix resurfacing of $1,021,874. This represents an average of $72,350 per mile for the entire town street system. It should be noted that this cost estimate is for pavement repair only. Additional costs can be incurred for drainage improvements, administration, utility adjustments, work zone traffic control, and other items. Please note that these costs are variable and can increase the total project cost significantly.
Summary of 2024 Pavement Condition Survey Results for the THB
A. Use of Survey Results
The Pavement Condition Survey is an objective evaluation of the amount and severity of eight types of pavement distress. The results of the survey should never be used arbitrarily. There is no substitute for in-the-field engineering judgment and experience in determining the types of maintenance activities needed. The street listings should be used as a guide for planning and scheduling maintenance activities. It is important to understand how the results were calculated before using this information.
B. Priorities
Although all recommended maintenance activities are needed right away, often there are more maintenance needs than funds available. Therefore, the types of maintenance should be prioritized. High Priority maintenance should include skin patching, short overlays, full-depth patching, crack pouring, and resurfacing of alligator cracking and rutting. Medium Priority maintenance includes resurfacing of severe block/transverse cracking, severe raveling, and severe bleeding. Low Priority maintenance should consist of resurfacing for moderate block/transverse cracking, moderate raveling, rough ride quality, and severe patching. Table 8 shown below lists these levels of priority with the anticipated cost for each level and the cost per mile for work in that priority range.
Previously reported – November 2015
Shane Lippard, Right Angle Engineering presented Streets Condition Survey report
We have a total of 12.8 paved asphalt roadways
Subject streets are Class A (low volume) roads
40% of the roads need maintenance
Total estimated costs are a whopping $1,200,000
The average cost of $93,750 per mile for the entire street system
The cost estimate is for pavement repair only, with the costs being variable
Draft report is a planning document
Surface evaluation was done rating each street and prioritizing the work that needs to be done
Recommended we address it with a ten-year game plan, budgeting accordingly, tackling it on a yearly basis
Understandably we can expect our streets to continue to degrade while costs will continue to go up
In 2015 the Board implemented a tax increase of $.010 specifically for street paving and maintenance. The penny worth of tax revenue earmarked for paving is money that is already in the budget.
Update –
Item was removed from the agenda
4. Presentation on Water and Sewer System Asset Management Plan – Green Engineering (Public Works Director Clemmons)
Agenda Packet – page 11 – 33, plus separate packets
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation on Water and Sewer System Asset Management Plan
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Green Engineering has completed the Water and Sewer System Asset Management Plan and is here to present the results
Asset Management Plan » click here
Asset Inventory Maps » click here
Previously reported – May 2024
ISSUE/ ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation on Water and Sewer System Asset Management Plan
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Green Engineering has completed the Water and Sewer System Asset Management Plan and is here to present the results.
Executive Summary
This Asset Management Plan is developed for the Holden Beach Water System and provides the overall inventory of the assets in the system, the condition of infrastructure of the system, a look at future development through the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), and a detailed description of the Operations and Maintenance of the existing infrastructure. The goal is to have a well-maintained and reliable water system for all customers now and in the future.
The plan has the following breakouts and direction:
- Increase the knowledge and overall understanding of the system by the Town and its users, including field staff who maintain the system daily.
- Provide overall asset listing for major items within the water system.
- Communicate and show how the assets were rated and the conditions of the assets.
- Proactively plan for replacement and upgrades to equipment before the end of infrastructure life cycles.
- Provide a management roadmap and direction for the Town’s employees and Council to plan for needed financial investment and rates for the service.
Update –
Representative Barry Parks from Green Engineering reviewed the process, reasons for the plan, assets, condition of the system, and recommendation for future development. The presentation is included in the meeting agenda packet. He encouraged the Town to develop a staff succession plan. From my perspective, the takeaway here is that the Water and Sewer System are in very good shape at this time.
5. Police Report – Chief Jeremy Dixon
Agenda Packet – pages 34 – 39
Police Report » click here
Jeremy reviewed the actions that were taken by them last month
We are in the shoulder season
They experienced a normal seasonal decline of activity
.
He reviewed the status of the current hiring process to fill the three (3) vacant positions in the department
The Chief reminded everyone that runners and walkers should be on the sidewalk not in the bike lane
Public Service Announcement
Hunting season runs from October till the end of January
Jeremy stated that hunting is prohibited within Town limits
Please notify the Police Department if you hear shots being fired
§130.01 DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS.
It shall be unlawful for a person to shoot or project any stone, rock, shot, or other hard substance by means of a slingshot, bean shooter, air rifle, popgun, bow, or other similar contrivance, or to fire any pistol, gun, or other firearms within the town except on archery ranges, firing ranges, or in legally-established shooting galleries or ranges, or in the discharge of duty by law enforcement officers, provided that the use of firearms in the destruction of rodents, pigeons, squirrels, or similar animals or birds or reptiles that are considered to be a menace to public health or property may be permitted by special permission of the Chief of Police.
§130.02 HUNTING PROHIBITED.
It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to do any hunting of wildlife with dogs or without dogs within the town limits.
Personnel announcement:
Not only did they not fill the open detective position, but an officer has also resigned
The department now has three (3) vacancies
The police department currently has only eight (8) officers of the eleven (11) they are budgeted to have.
Having the full complement of eleven (11) police officers seems to be an elusive goal.
What he did not say –
Festival by the Sea is scheduled for October 26th– 27th, expect traffic and plan accordingly
Seasonal change – Pets allowed back on the beach strand effective September 10th
- Dog’s need to be on a leash
- Owner’s need to clean up after their animals
If you know something, hear something, or see something –
call 911 and let the police deal with it.
6. Inspections Department Report – Inspections Director Evans
Agenda Packet – pages 40 – 45
Inspections Report » click here
ACTIVE NEW HOME PERMITS = 28
OTHER ACTIVE PERMITS = 412
PERMITS ISSUED OVER $30,000 = 40
* AMOUNT INCLUDED IN ACTIVE TOTAL
PERMITS ISSUED OVER $100,000 = 5
* AMOUNT INCLUDED IN ACTIVE TOTAL
PERMITS ISSUED SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS = 0
* AMOUNT INCLUDED IN ACTIVE TOTAL
PERMITS ISSUED WAITING PICK UP = 23
TOTAL PERMITS = 463
PERMITS IN REVIEW = 5
CAMA ISSUED = 1
ZONING ISSUED = 10
PERMITS SERVICED FOR INSPECTIONS FROM 09/07 – 10/07 = 101
TOTAL INSPECTIONS MADE = 203
Update –
Timbo briefly reviewed department activity last month, and the department has not been as busy. Right now, they have a steady stream of work, new construction usually cranks up sometime later in the month. He also reviewed the status of projects in the ADA Key Bridge Mediation Agreement and the additional tasks that we initiated above what was required. He anticipates that everything will be completed before the March deadline.
Contractors Information Seminar
The Planning & Inspections Department, supported by the town staff, will be hosting the thirteenth annual Contractors Information Seminar.
7. Finance Department Report – Finance Officer McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 46 – 49
Finance Report » click here
Finance Report Charts » click here
Revenues to Watch
AD VALOREM TAX
FY 24 / 5,913.67
FY 25 / 8,358.03
PARKING REVENUE
FY 24 / 332,458.63
FY 25 / 352,077.93
OCCUPANCY TAX
FY 24 / 2,723,316.81
FY25 / 2,858,478.78
Revenues are looking good through September very comparable to last year.
Ad valorem consist of prior year taxes at this time.
Parking and occupancy tax revenues show a slight increase over last year.
Revenues vs. Expenditures by Fund
Three graphs were presented, with fiscal year comparisons of the following funds:
. 1) General Fund
. 2) Water/Sewer Fund
. 3) BPART Fund
BPART Fund – Beach Preservation / Access & Recreation / Tourism
BPART is a Special Revenue Fund authorized by act of the General Assembly which allows the Town to collect six cents of an Accommodations Tax for the purposes of funding beach preservation and tourism related expenses.
Update –
Daniel briefly reviewed the status of each of the three (3) funds. Working with the Audit Committee he modified the reports to make them more informative.
8. Town Manager Report – Town Manager Hewett
Agenda Packet – pages 50 – 51
Town Manager Report » click here
Greensboro Street / Sewer Lift Station #2
We have approvals from both the EPA and NCDWQ
Awaiting TerraHawk contract review
David anticipates having it by the end of the week
The next step is for the Town Attorney to review the documents
The Town can then execute the contract with the subsequent Notice to Proceed
796 OBW
Tentative closing date of October 17th. They will temporarily book proceeds from that sale to Water & Sewer miscellaneous revenue account. Follow-up in November, he will bring a budget amendment for the Board to authorize debt prepayment with a budget amendment
NC General Assembly
Assembly convenes mid-January for the long session
The board may wish to have any asks ready sooner rather than later
Coastal Resources Commission
Meeting will be held on OIB in mid-November
They are tracking the Inlet Hazard Area revisions closely
Probably won’t be addressed until sometime next year
Previously reported – September 2022
Discussion of the changes Coastal Resources Commission approved last month to both the rules and Inlet Hazard Area boundaries. Commissioner Kwiatkowski was asking the staff what will be the impact on us here at Holden Beach. Timbo informed us that the boundary and vegetation line overall impact will be minimal to us.
Population
Certified population estimate for Holden Beach is now 1,054 people
This is important because it is the basis for State Distributed Revenues
In 2022, Holden Beach, NC had a population of 997 people
with a median age of 63.7 and a median household income of $106,375
Ocean Boulevard Bike Lanes
NCDOT cost overrun
Estimate $1,722,364: actual $1,797,424
The delta is $75,060 with the Town’s share being 42%, which would be $31,525
David is coordinating with DOT to review the project and identify potential alternative funding to satisfy overrun
Maintenance –
DOT advises that state’s standard of care is not what Town will require
Staff reviewing options for service provision: in-house versus contract for sweeping
We will need an agreement with the DOT for the Town to conduct street sweeping
Bike Lane Maintenance
Good news: We have a bike lane now
Bad news: We are not even doing routine maintenance of the bike lane
A significant number of locations of the bike lane have sand, gravel, rocks, and broken glass from recycling trucks. Therefore, it is unsafe especially for young and/or inexperienced bicycle riders. Not a good situation, if someone goes down they could easily slide into the traffic lane, which would have some serious negative consequences. NCDOT only provides maintenance service a few times a year. Standard protocol is for the town to take care of the bike lane with their staff. If Public Works is unable to get it done perhaps we should consider a contract with a vendor to handle routine maintenance until they are able to do it. Any lawn maintenance service with a blower should be able to take care of it in the interim. This is a safety issue that needs to be addressed, sooner rather than later.
Key Bridge Mediation Agreement
Quinton Street/ 114 OBE – Public Beach Access & Restroom Facility
All ADA requirements have been met
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
The facility is fully operational now
Ave E – Public/Emergency Beach Access and Restroom Facility
Notice to Proceed issued to Babson contract for $168,365
Due date of February 1st
Previously reported – September 2024
This is the area at the far east end of the island. They have obtained the necessary permits for ADA compliant parking, public and emergency accesses, and restroom facilities. Request for Proposal has been drafted. Anticipate construction would begin in the fall and must be completed by the March 2025 deadline.
801 OBW – Public Beach Access
Notice to Proceed issued to Jesse & Meyers contract for $48,900
Due date of November 15th
Previously reported – September 2024
They have made some design refinements for the Emergency and Public Access there to accommodate the adjacent properties. A CAMA permit has been applied for. We still need to build a walkway there.
ADA Self-Evaluation
ADA Self-Assessment Request For Proposals due October 15th
We received only one response and that was to the tune of $100,000
Previously reported – September 2024
The Town of Holden Beach is requesting proposals from qualified individuals and firms for consulting services related to an ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. The Town is specifically looking for firms that specialize in providing ADA consulting as a core business function.
What he did not say –
Stormwater Project Partnership Agreement (PPA)
Previously reported – March 2024
Town staff met with USACE Program Manager in February to develop a draft PPA. Awaiting draft PPA for about a half dozen projects for an estimated cost of two (2) million dollars. The intent is to position the Town to receive federal stormwater funding for these projects.
In Case You Missed It –
THB Newsletter (10/08/24)
Aerial Spraying for Mosquitos
Brunswick County has notified the Town that aerial spraying for mosquitoes in the County will begin Friday, October 11, 2024, weather permitting. The countywide aerial spraying is part of Brunswick County’s emergency response to the increased mosquito populations caused by heavy rainfall and flooding from Tropical Storm Debby and Potential Tropical Cyclone #8.
VDCI crews are scheduled to begin using airplanes to spray insecticides over the county during the week of October 11th through October 18th, weather permitting. Spraying will start at dusk. Click here to view the aerial spraying schedule and map of planned routes. Exact routes are subject to change depending on weather conditions. If weather conditions delay spraying, it will begin Monday, October 14th or any subsequent day as weather conditions allow.
When applied by a licensed vector control professional who follows label instructions, aerial spraying poses minimal risk to people, pets, animals, and the environment. Aerial spraying uses very low volumes of either adulticide or larvicide, so you are not likely to breathe or touch anything that has enough insecticide on it to harm you. Individuals located in the areas being sprayed are encouraged to avoid being outside during evening hours if possible as there is a possibility that spraying adulticides can cause eye irritation if a person is outside when spraying takes place.
Click here to read the full press release from Brunswick County and for information for Beekeepers.
For additional questions, contact Brunswick County Mosquito Control at 910.253.2515 or email [email protected].
THB Newsletter (10/11/24)
Aerial Spraying for Mosquitos
Brunswick County has asked the Town to share the following information.
A Message to Residents about the Public Health Need for Post-Disaster Aerial Mosquito Spraying
Brunswick County understands that there have been some concerns about the post-disaster aerial mosquito spray scheduled for the week of Oct. 11 through Oct. 18, 2024. This service is vital to protect the health and safety of our residents from the threat of mosquitoes in the area. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mosquito-borne diseases are among the world’s leading causes of illness and death today. Mosquitoes pose significant health risks to humans and animals, as many mosquitoes can carry harmful diseases like West Nile virus, Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEE), Dirofilaria immitis (dog heartworm disease), La Crosse virus, and dengue virus (break-bone fever). Columbus County recently reported an increase in West Nile virus cases in their area.
Here are a few key points and reminders you should be aware of:
- Dibrom (Naled) is an insecticide that is an EPA-approved substance and has been registered since 1959 for use in the United States.
- Brunswick County has previously contracted with Vector Disease Control International (VDCI) to perform this mosquito control service after Hurricane Florence in 2018.
- Brunswick County is working with beekeepers in the area to protect their hives and are staying in contact with the schools and municipalities (incorporated towns, cities, and villages).
- During the day on Friday, Oct. 11, VDCI crewmembers will fly their planes around 500ft above the county to identify any potential obstacles or areas to avoid. No insecticides will be sprayed during daytime hours.
Frequently Asked Questions
Brunswick County has compiled a list of frequently asked questions and answers about the post-disaster aerial spraying.
Why is aerial spraying necessary?
Aerial spraying of insecticides is used to control and reduce the overall number of mosquitoes and most importantly to reduce the population of mosquitoes that can spread harmful diseases. It is much more effective and faster than truck-mounted or handheld sprayers in treating large areas of land. This can help post-disaster recovery operations and reduce your chances of getting sick. To combat the threat these mosquitoes can cause to recovery efforts and public health, Brunswick County has activated its aerial mosquito control contract with Vector Disease Control International (VDCI).
When will the spraying take place in my area?
The map of Brunswick County Aerial Mosquito Spray Zones (PDF) includes a spray schedule for different populated areas within the county. Each of the three zones will be sprayed during their corresponding dates. Those who plan to take extra precautions should do so each night in their zone’s date range. If any changes to the schedule are necessary, we will share them on our website at brunswickcountync.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=299.
How will the spraying affect pollinators and other insects like bees, dragonflies, and butterflies?
To better protect the public and insects like bees, sprays are scheduled for dusk when honeybees, dragonflies, and butterflies are less active, and is completed by dawn. The timing of this service also ensures that the product selected is less persistent in the atmosphere for safer foraging the following day.
Although the timing of the service decreases the chance of significant exposure to insecticides, beekeepers should take precautions to protect their hives.
Please take the following actions to reduce potential exposure and protect your bees:
- Move your bees out of the county until the sprays end.
- Cover your hives with a loose wet material such as a sheet on the evenings when aerial spraying will be conducted.
- Provide clean sources of food (supplemental sugar water and protein diets) and clean drinking water to honeybee colonies.
- Tell other beekeepers so they can avoid colony loss during this necessary aerial application.
Any beekeepers who have questions or are not registered should call N.C. Cooperative Extension – Brunswick County Center at 910-253-2610 or visit brunswick.ces.ncsu.edu for information.
Will the spraying affect my vegetable garden?
Dibrom (Naled), the insecticide used in the aerial spraying, is used primarily for controlling adult mosquitoes but is also used on food and feed crops and in greenhouses. Naled is approved for use on many crops and EPA has established safe residue levels for all crops. Aerial ultra-low volume (ULV) sprays dispense very fine aerosol droplets containing small quantities of active ingredient that stay aloft and kill mosquitoes on contact. The amount that reaches the ground is tiny and it dissipates quickly. Aerial ULV spray applications are designed to kill adult mosquitoes across large areas of land with the least impacts to humans, animals, and non-target insects as possible. Brunswick County and VDCI used this product to control and reduce mosquito populations after Hurricane Florence in 2018.
Will cooler weather impact the mosquito population?
Although Brunswick County is experiencing some cooler weather, it is not cold enough to significantly decrease the mosquito population. Mosquitoes become less active when temperatures consistently drop below 50°F and most will perish or go dormant once temperatures fall below 32°F. Brunswick County will perform the aerial spraying to protect residents from the immediate threat of mosquito-borne diseases.
Who do I contact to learn more about spraying in my area?
Information about the status of the post-disaster mosquito control response will be shared here on this webpage. Updates will also be shared via email, social media, and local media outlets.
For questions about aerial spraying, email Brunswick County Mosquito Control at [email protected] or [email protected].
Beekeepers with questions should call N.C. Cooperative Extension – Brunswick County Center at 910-253-2610 or visit brunswick.ces.ncsu.edu for information.
THB Newsletter (06/03/24)
Hurricane Season
June 1st is the official start to the hurricane season in the Atlantic. Would your family be prepared in the event of a hurricane? Click here to visit the Emergency Information section of our website. You will find helpful tips to implement now, before the threat of a storm. Please make sure you have your vehicle decals in place now. Do not wait! These decals are necessary for re-entry to the island in the event of an emergency situation that restricts access to the island. Click here for more information on decals.
Pets on the Beach Strand
Pets – Chapter 90 / Animals / 90.20
Effective September 10th
- Pets allowed back on the beach strand during the hours of 9:00am through 5:00pm
- Dog’s need to be on a leash
- Owner’s need to clean up after their animals
Solid Waste Pick-up Schedule –
starting October once a week
Recycling –
starting October every other week pick-up
National Flood Insurance Program: Reauthorization
Congress must periodically renew the NFIP’s statutory authority to operate. On September 26, 2024, the president signed legislation passed by Congress that extends the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP’s) authorization to December 20, 2024.
News from Town of Holden Beach
The town sends out emails of events, news, agendas, notifications and emergency information. If you would like to be added to their mailing list, please go to their web site to complete your subscription to the Holden Beach E-Newsletter.
For more information » click here
Upcoming Events –
Shag Lessons / October 16th through November 20th
Volunteer Appreciation Luncheon / October 25th
Barktoberfest / October 25th
N.C. Festival by the Sea / October 26th & 27th
Monster Mash Trunk-or-Treat / October 31st
Veterans Appreciation Luncheon / November 8th
Turkey Trot / November 23rd
///
Contractors Information Seminar / TBD
Tree Lighting / TBD
9. Audit Committee Report Regarding the Annual Audit – Mayor Pro Tem Myers
Agenda Packet – page 52
Audit Committee Report » click here
Audio Recording » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion of the Audit Committee findings and recommendation regarding the Town’s annual audit
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Town Ordinance §30.27 specifies that the Audit Committee shall monitor the performance of the external audit firm as it relates to the annual audit of the town, review the annual audit report with the external auditor, and provide a written opinion to the BOC. The external auditor has provided draft content for the Audit Committee to review. The Audit Committee met on October 11th to review the audit information and address questions with the external auditor. Based on these efforts, the Audit Committee is presenting its findings and recommendations.
The Audit Committee shall: (1) Serve as an advisory committee for the town’s Board of Commissioners (BOC); (2) Assist and advise the BOC in its oversight responsibilities for the town’s financial reporting process, systems of internal financial controls and the external audit process; (3) Recommend to the BOC each year the selection of the independent external audit firm to conduct the annual external audit, using a request for proposals selection process when deemed necessary by the Audit Committee; (4) Monitor the performance of the commercial public accounting firms providing audit services to the town; (5) Monitor the performance of the external audit firm as it relates to the annual audit of the town; (6) Review the annual audit report with the external auditor and provide a written opinion to the BOC; (7) Periodically confirm the suitability of the town’s internal control systems and/or policies, including information technology security and control; (8) Receive confirmation that audit report recommendations have been acted upon in advance of the commencement of the next external audit; (9) Perform other functions from time to time as shall be delegated or assigned to it by the BOC.
Update –
Mayor Pro Tem Myers briefly reviewed the Audit Committee report. Tom reported that we have very strong financial results, which is really good news. The audit will be submitted as required to the Local Government Commission on time. The auditor will be here to do a presentation at the November Regular Meeting.
10. Discussion and Possible Action on Long-Term Summer Concert Venue – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Thomas
Agenda Packet – page 53
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discuss and possible action on long term summer concert venue
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Previous concert venue (pavilion next to sewer station #1) was condemned and removed before the 2024 concert season
2024 concerts were held at the Bridgewater Park pavilion:
- This required closing the park on Sunday afternoons to prep the area and allow bands to set up
- Portable toilets were rented to provide bathroom facilities (park bathrooms were locked/closed during concerts)
Review Lessons Learned – feedback from town employees and concert goers
Discuss 2025 plan for concerts –
- Bridgeview park again?
- Temporary
- Rented stage somewhere else? (where)
- New pavilion? (where)
Update –
Commissioner Thomas wanted to be proactive and start the discussion of what we want to do for concerts next year. They were all over the place, it does not seem that they are all on the same page. Both am interim and permanent location for the summer concerts was discussed. The Board requested to have the site plan, without the parking, that they previously reviewed presented to them again next month. Realistically we are not going to get this resolved for the 2025 concert season. Commissioner Smith said you can’t finish till you start. At least this is a start.
Plans for Block Q are all over the place, it is not a panacea. What if parking is provided elsewhere? We proposed additional parking on Jordan Boulevard way back in 2005. I am not a big fan of the original Boulevard plan (see picture below). The Town owns the property/land on both sides of the current street configuration. I’m thinking more of a promenade down the center, with parking on both sides of it as well as parking on the sides. By incorporating a Jordan Boulevard project with the Block Q project, it would allow us to have a lot more flexibility with what can be done at Block Q, like pickleball and/or a concert venue.
11. Discussion and Possible Action on Having the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Do an Evaluation of Adding Pickleball Courts to the Island – Commissioners Smith and Dyer
Agenda Packet – pages 54 – 55
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible action on having the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) do an evaluation of adding pickleball courts on the island. Currently there are user, user conflicts with basketball and pickleball based on its increased popularity. Evaluating the feasibility of having more courts now will aid in fine tuning locations as the PRAB continues to work through its master plan.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
There Is increased popularity in the amount of people playing pickleball and the Town may need to investigate investing in additional courts.
As part of the tasker from the cover sheet, I would like us to specifically consider the following during the discussion:
- Location- Ideas include 800 block, Lois and Gerda, site of old pavilion, new property,
- Approval of Funding for Professional Services that may be needed to aid the PRAB – surveys, field trips if needed to view other facilities, etc. (available to appropriate BPART)
- Cost estimates- The PRAB should supply the BOC with cost estimates to the best of its ability based on similar projects currently being Items to accompany the court that may be required on the site should also be considered (fence, lighting, parking, restrooms, etc.)
Update –
They seemed to agree that we have outgrown the current location. They want the Parks & Recreation Board to consider possible pickleball court locations at Town owned land and establish what are the minimum requirements that would be needed for the courts. Timbo pointed out that they were getting ahead of themselves and explained the right way for them to proceed. David said there probably will be some costs involved and explained that the Manager can make adjustments within the existing budget. The BOC’s authorized David, spending up to $5,000 to get the ball rolling.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Editor’s Note –
For recreational players, a standard pickleball court measures 20 feet by 44 feet. USA Pickleball’s guidance on minimum playing surfaces requires the court to sit evenly inside a 30-foot width and 64-foot length, which adds 10 feet to the width and 20 feet to the length. The Town has two (2) cross-through rights-of-ways between OBW and BAW near Marker 55. The properties are 55 feet by 250 feet each, which could readily accommodate the 30-foot width and 64-foot length that is required.
Commissioner Paarfus asked them to consider addressing both these projects collectively. I agree I don’t think we should take a piecemeal approach.
Start with the end in mind!
What is Pickleball you ask?
Pickleball: growing sport for seniors
Pickleball originated in 1965 on Bainbridge Island, Washington. The ball used is a perforated plastic ball similar to a Whiffle ball. The game is easy for beginners to learn, but can develop into a fast-paced, competitive game for experienced players. The net is a couple inches lower than a tennis court net and the court is smaller too (20 feet by 44 feet vs. 36 by 78), and the paddles are oversized ping pong paddles made of plywood, aluminum or graphite. The game can be played with two or four players. Experience in tennis, badminton and ping pong is helpful, as there are similarities with those sports. There already are over 100,000 players in the United States alone. When tennis and badminton players find it difficult to navigate the larger courts, the next step is Pickleball, where there is not as much running required.
Read more » click here
What is Pickleball?
Read more » click here
What is Pickleball and Why is It So Popular?
Read more » click here
Pickleball: The fastest growing sport you’ve never heard of
Looking for a new warm-weather sport? Try pickleball. And, no, it’s not just for seniors.
Read more » click here
12. Discussion and Possible Action on Ordinance 24-15, Ordinance Amending The Holden Beach Code Of Ordinances, Chapter 72: Parking Regulations – Town Clerk Finnell
Agenda Packet – pages 56 – 59
Ordinance 24-15 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Ordinance 24-15, An Ordinance Amending The Holden Beach Code of Ordinances Chapter 72: Parking Regulations
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST: In October 2022, the Board voted to suspend paid parking island wide for the festival. In January 2023, in response to a Board tasker, staff recommended that paid parking continue to be suspended island wide festival weekends. The proposed amendment updates the ordinance to reflect the past precedent of no paid parking during festival weekends. It also proposes to remove the section pertaining to the HB Pavilion since the structure was demolished. If a new structure is added, parking in that area can be discussed at that time.
Staff recommends making a motion to approve Ordinance 24-15.
ORDINANCE 24-15
(12) Parking is authorized without a permit island wide during town events at the discretion of the town manager.
Update –
In the past, in an effort to better facilitate the Festival by the Sea, the Board of Commissioners suspended paid parking island wide for festival weekend. The amended Ordinance will authorize the Town Manager to suspend paid parking. There was no discussion about whether or not they also planned to suspend enforcement island wide.
The motion made was to adopt the Ordinance as submitted and suspend paid parking for festivals.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Since this issue of enforcement was not discussed there is some confusion regarding enforcement. Does that mean that all other parking regulations are in effect and will be enforced? Or will we suspend enforcement island wide too? Frankly, it’s a zoo out there during the festival weekend. With all the parking problems that happen during the festivals you would think we would want to continue enforcing parking in designated areas only. By suspending enforcement people can and will park anywhere they want.
13. Discussion on Possible Actions for Non-Legislative Actions to Inform the Public of Holden Beach Code of Ordinances §91.17, Concerning the Placement of Open Flame Devices – Commissioners Dyer and Paarfus
Agenda Packet – pages 60 – 61
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion on possible actions for non-legislative actions to inform the public of the Holden Beach General regulation 91.17 restriction concerning the placement of open flame devices
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Several residents have observed the practice of using open flame devices under houses in violation of 91.17 (attached). This usually is the result of the individual having no knowledge of the regulation’s required standoff distance. It is desirable to find an effective means of informing the public about this important safety issue., particularly because houses typically burn in 2;3 or 3’s due to proximity and environmental concerns.
§91.17 OPEN FLAME DEVICES.
Charcoal burners and other open flame devices shall not be operated on or within ten feet of combustible construction. Exception: propane fueled grills.
Update –
Discussion was about ways of informing the public concerning the placement of open flame devices. They tossed around a couple of ideas and they felt that they could communicate most effectively through the property management companies. It was decided to have the staff contact the property management companies to get their input on ways to improve communications regarding Town ordinances.
Editor’s Note –
It is my understanding that Hobbs Realty addresses this issue by recommending, if they opt for charcoal, that each rental property have park grills fixed in place away from the structure. That seems like a pretty simple solution, albeit with a minor cost for each rental property. They also notify guests in arrival emails of pertinent ordinances like this one. I’m thinking those are ideas could be a benchmark for the other rental companies.
14. Discussion and Possible Action for the Adoption of an Action Tracking Tool for Certain Fiscal Year 2024 – 2025 Board of Commissioners’ Objectives – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Paarfus
Agenda Packet – pages 62 – 67
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion on possible action for the adoption of an action tracking tool for certain 2024 – 2025 BOC Objectives with the initial distribution to the BOC by 8 October 2024
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The purpose of this request is to consider adoption of an action tracking tool for certain FY 24-25 BOC objectives (see attachments 1-3) that can he expanded, as necessary. An example of the tool is attached.
Currently, the status of several BOC objectives do not have sufficient visibility for proper oversight and/or may not be receiving the appropriate attention. Additionally, some items, while visible, do not have the basic steps clearly defined with target completion dates established, or identification of the parties who are responsible for achieving the objective. While work may be ongoing, it is not generally visible to the BOC or public unless a specific inquiry is made and may not be documented for future reference.
The purpose of the action tracking tool is to ensure that the BOC and staff do not lose sight of the objectives or their relative priorities when other issues arise. The system will also establish some expectations for progress towards satisfying the objectives, aid in identifying obstacles to progress, and allow for a shift in priorities if needed due to emerging issues.
It is recommended that the action officers update the information monthly and that it be provided to the BOC on the first Tuesday of each month (with the exception of the initial distribution). Updates are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provide a brief synopsis of the objective’s status that highlights progress, challenges, or a change in priority.
Not all objectives need tracking. As an example, ADA compliance (Objective 1) does not require tracking as that is being aggressively pursued and is visible. Others, such as the Fire Station investigation (Objective 7), do not have a clearly defined path forward.
The following BOC Objectives are recommended for tracking action:
#2 – ADA Self-Assessment
#6 -ADA bathroom (at block Q)
#7 – Fire Station Upgrades
#8 – Improve Audio/Video for Town Meetings
#14 Block Q site plan
#18 – Update Town Website
#19 – Pier repair/replacement
#26 – Investigate vacuum bypass system.
Given that the first quarter of the current fiscal year is nearly over and that the next budget process will begin in January, it is strongly recommended that the tracking tool for these 8 initial items be adopted to support decision making and the upcoming budget process.
Update –
They are looking for a status report on a monthly basis, for the eight (8) items listed, in order to track the progress of projects that they have prioritized. Not really sure what exactly they agreed to or what David will provide them monthly. I guess we will have to wait and see.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
15. Discussion and Possible Action on an Amendment to the Stormwater Master Plan – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Thomas
Agenda Packet – page 68
ISSUE/ ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action on an amendment to the Stormwater Master Plan
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
At the August BOC meeting, a resolution was passed to adopt the Stormwater Master Plan. The Town is now proceeding to obtain grants and external funding to implement the plan. Once we have applied and been accepted for funding, we will likely be restricted to spending it only on the areas defined in the plan.
There are two additional areas on the island that have significant flooding issues: OBE to the east of the entrance to Dunescape, and the canal streets. We should consider adding these areas to the plan before we apply for any grants or funding that would restrict our scope to only the six identified areas.
Possible Action:
Obtain a quote from McGill and Associates to amend the plan to include these new areas.
Previously reported – June 2024
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Stormwater Master Plan Report
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
McGill completed the Stormwater Master Plan Report and is here to present the results
Areas of Concern Analysis
○ Analyze the existing stormwater system and drainage conditions at each area of concern for the 2-year and 10-year rainfall events.
○ Identify deficiencies in the network at these locations and evaluate available alternatives to remedy flooding.
○ Develop probable estimates of construction cost
○ Provide supporting documentation to Town for US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Federal 5113 Environmental Infrastructure Assistance grant
Representatives from McGill Associates did a slide presentation which was not included in the agenda packet but is available with the link below. They reviewed their analysis for the six (6) areas of concern. They provided a probable construction range of cost estimate based on current construction costs with the overall cost total will be in excess of two (2) million dollars. Scenario A assumes 100% of the projected capital investment needs are funded by user fees generated by the stormwater utility. Based on the project cost of capital stormwater projects and on-going and planned maintenance for the stormwater system they recommend proceeding with implementation of Scenario A with an initial flat rate of $7.20/month for each parcel on the island. The plan is current and incorporated the additional asphalt from the Ocean Boulevard resurfacing and bike lane project in their analysis, so they don’t think it had a significant impact.
No decision was made – No action taken
The Ocean Boulevard resurfacing and bike lane project has eliminated some of the areas of concern and has created some new ones.
Previously reported – August 2024
Stormwater Master Plan Report » click here
Stormwater Master Plan Presentation » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Adoption of McGill Stormwater Master Plan
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Holden Beach Board of Commissioners directed development of a town stormwater plan. McGill and Associates has prepared and delivered a report of same to the Board at its regular June meeting. The report identifies six long standing issues and potential funding strategies to implement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve attached Resolution 24-07 adopting the McGill Stormwater Master Plan and directing related staff actions.
Resolution 24-07 » click here
The proposed resolution is a plan to forward and address our stormwater issues. It is simply a guideline, which we can refine, prioritize, and enables us to apply for funding. David stressed the approval of this plan will allow us to move forward strategically, and that they need to adopt the plan. It’s hard to ask for grants if you don’t have a plan. The motion was made to move forward with the plan as submitted. They stated that this is not a panacea, but just our first step to address stormwater issues.
Update –
The discussion was about adding other locations to the stormwater plan as part of grant application. They agreed to appended the existing stormwater plan to add two (2) projects. The first is OBE to the east of the entrance to Dunescape, and the second is the canal streets. Tom wanted them to consider adding these areas to the plan before we apply for any grants or funding. There was agreement on adding the locations, not so much about applying for funding before they are added. David said that he plans on getting it done as soon as they can, but they may not be able to include them in the grant application. The Board directed the staff to contact McGill Associates for a proposal for the additional locations.
A decision was made – Approved (4-1)
Commissioner Smith opposed the motion
16. Discussion and Possible Action on Documenting an Emergency Pumping Plan – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Thomas
Agenda Packet – pages 69 – 70
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action on documenting an Emergency Pumping Plan.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST
We need to address the street flooding problems we experienced during the last two storms, the complaints received from residents & property owners, and the fact the Stormwater Master Plan does not address these types of events. An Emergency Pumping Plan is needed for dealing with rain events like the ones we just recently experienced. The focus needs to be on safety and property damage with prioritization based on the impact to residents and property owners.
It would be very helpful for this plan to be documented and communicated to stakeholders so everyone can understand why we are deploying our resources to specific locations, and whether or not they should anticipate pumping to be performed at their location. Hopefully, this will reduce the frustration and anger we are now experiencing .
Possible Action:
Direct the Town Manager to work with the Public Works Director to document an Emergency Pumping Plan that includes the following:
- References to relevant regulations from the DEQ and other regulators
- Factors used to determine when to close a road
- Factors used to determine where pumping will occur and the prioritization sequence
- Other factors that impact priorities and pumping (e.g., sewer system issues)
- Current resource limitations
- Potential solutions and associated funding needs
Update –
The agenda item was requesting an Emergency Pumping Plan dealing with rain events. Specifically, Tom was requesting documenting the decision making process. He was not asking them to change anything, simply wanted to improve communication of what we are doing to the public. David suggested a tasker to the Town with developing a flood water management discharge plan that meets the requirements of the Department of Environmental Quality Resources. The Mayor based on his vast experience and being the Emergency Management Director explained why this was not a good idea. He stated that they react to the circumstances as they unfold, prioritization is based on the impact to the greatest amount of people. It’s not in our best interest to have a plan in writing. The Board chose not to move forward with an Emergency Pumping Plan at this time.
No decision was made – No action taken
17. Discussion and Possible Action on Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Agreements – Public Works Director Clemmons
- Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Management Agreement for Primary Provider (Southern Disaster Recovery, LLC)
- Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Management Agreement for Secondary Provider (CTC Disaster Response)
- Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Planning & Support Management Agreement for Primary Provider – (Tetra Tech, Inc)
- Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Planning & Support Management Agreement forSecondary Provider (Metric Consulting, LLC)
Agenda Packet – pages 71 – 72, plus separate packets
Disaster Agreement A & B » click here
Disaster Agreement C & D » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Agreements
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town is a participant in the Brunswick County’s Multi-Jurisdictional agreements for Disaster Debris Management and Disaster Debris Planning & Support Management (monitoring). The County released an RFP earlier this year for both Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Contracts. The County Commissioners approved the award of the primary Multi-Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Management Contract to Southern Disaster Recovery, LLC and the secondary agreement to CTC Disaster Response. They will be considering award of the primary Disaster Debris Planning & Support Management Agreement to Tetra Tech, Inc and the secondary to Metric Consulting at their October 7th meeting. The contracts are essential to recovery in an emergency situation. Staff recommends approving all four of the agreements presented.
Previously reported – October 2023
The County has informed the Town that the Multijurisdictional Disaster Debris Management contract with Southern Disaster Recovery, LLC does not include the removal of eligible hazardous tress of less than six inches in diameter. The proposed amendment to the contract adds this service to the fee schedule in the contract.
The recommended motion is to approve the second amendment to the contract between Southern Disaster Recovery, LLC, and the Town of Holden Beach.
Contractor and Activating Entity previously entered into a Multi Jurisdictional Disaster Debris Management contract with an effective date of September 12, 2019. It now appears there was an omission in the fee schedule for removal of eligible hazardous trees with work consisting of removing hazardous trees. Contractor and Activating Entity have agreed to amend the original contract to set forth the facts for said additional services.
Update –
The message was plain and simple. We should stay the course, continue with what we have now, and participate in the Brunswick County’s Multi-Jurisdictional agreements. That’s what they did.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
18. Town Attorney Response to Tasker from the Board of Commissioners to Investigate the Town of Holden Beach’s Legal Requirements for the Pier Grants – Attorney Moore
Agenda Packet – pages 73 – 77
ISSUE/ ACTION REQUESTED:
Pier Tasker
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
BOC’s tasked Town Attorney to report on Town’s legal obligations for grants acquired on pier properties.
Legal Obligations on Pier Properties
5 year Development Requirement for property acquired with PARTF funds:
Town is not tied to the conceptual plan, but it does provide ideas for developing the property.
Development can be in the form of parking lot enhancement, bathroom or bathhouse enhancement, improvements of camping are,. picnic tables, shaded areas, recreational facilities, etc. Not limited to any of these ideas.
Pier House deemed to have no value in structure at purchase; may be removed, replaced, repurposed, etc.
Public recreation use should begin ASAP, can be delayed up to 5 years from start date of the PARTF grant contract. Property must be open to public to greatest extent possible.
- Interim facilities must at least include public access/parking on the site and some form of recreation (picnic area, trail, access, etc.
Previously reported – May 2024
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discuss and possible action on instructing the Town Attorney to investigate the Town of Holden Beach’s legal requirements from the Pier grants – the $500k PARTF grant (for tract 1) and the$180k Public Beach & Coastal Waterfront Access Program Grant (for Tract 2)
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town of Holden Beach received a PARTF grant for $500K toward the acquisition of Tract 1 and also received a $180k Public Beach & Coastal Waterfront Access Program Grant (for Tract 2) when they purchased the Pier property in 2022. It is unclear what the legal requirements are for the grants and before we can finalize a Pier Plan, we need to understand exactly what we are legally required to provide based on the grants.
Some of the Board members still have questions regarding what the Town is legally required to do by having accepted these grants. Basically, they want to know what can be included and what is required to be included before they approve any plan of action. They simply want to have all our ducks in a row and feel that the prudent thing to do is have our Town attorney review them. The motion was made to have the Town attorney investigate the Town’s legal requirements for the pier grants.
A decision was made – Approved (3-2)
Commissioners Smith and Dyer opposed the motion
Update –
The Town Attorney was tasked with determining our legal requirements by accepting the pier grants. Sydnee briefly reviewed the grant guidelines and presented a summary of the Town’s obligations. She was not able to get some of the answers from the grant itself. This is her official legal position after doing research and after speaking to Brittany the state coordinator who is the grant liaison person.
Key Takeaways
- Need to retain and use property for public access
- Town must keep property/facilities open and accessible for public use
- Need to develop parcels for recreational purposes
- Town must operate and maintain property
- Town is not tied to the conceptual plan
- Pier house has no value and can be removed, replaced, or repurposed
The motion was made to have the Town Attorney prepare a formal opinion to codify the information
A decision was made – Approved (3-2)
Commissioners Smith and Dyer opposed the motion
Moore Law firm was selected by this Board to provide legal services to the Town. Sydnee Moore is our Town Attorney. This is now the second time that some members of the Board questioned the Town Attorney’s legal opinion/determination when it was not the answer that they wanted to hear. This is ridiculous. Sydnee is our lawyer, we pay her for her professional legal opinion whether we like her opinion or not, they need to accept the Town Attorney’s findings and determination.
19. Mayor’s Comments
This is what he usually says, but he did not say
Alan was thankful that we got through the storm events this year with minimal damage. Although hurricane season is still on the calendar, traditionally by the middle of October we have been out of the woods. He feels that we have safely made it through another hurricane season and have been very fortunate this year.
From the Mayor’s Desk (10/03/24)
As response to Hurricane Helene continues and recovery intensifies, local donation drives have been organized to provide donations to Western North Carolina residents in need. Click here to view the website established by NCEM that provides guidance on how to donate to best support the needs of those impacted by Helene.
Individuals from outside storm damaged areas who are gathering supplies are urged to collect them but do not attempt to deliver them to Western North Carolina on their own. Needs vary from area to area and may change rapidly. Uncoordinated efforts to deliver supplies can disrupt ongoing rescue and relief efforts. If you are donating supplies, make sure you are giving to a legitimate effort and watch out for scams.
Travel conditions remain hazardous in much of Western North Carolina and people from outside the region are asked not to drive to the area on their own. More than 400 roadways remain dangerous with many impassible and are limited to local and hurricane response traffic only. Available routes should be reserved for ongoing emergency needs including search and rescue.
From the Mayor’s Desk (09/10/24)
The Town of Holden Beach is declaring September 2024 as Preparedness Month to raise awareness about the importance of preparing for disasters and emergencies that could happen at any time. Click here to read the full proclamation. As mayor/emergency management director, I encourage all citizens to develop their emergency plan, build an emergency kit and communicate your plan to your household. Click here for some helpful information you can use while developing your plan. Also, make sure you have your vehicle decals in place. Decals must be displayed in the lower left-hand corner of the windshield in the event we have an evacuation. Now is the time to “Start a Conversation”. It is important to be prepared for potential emergencies, do not wait.
General Comments –
BOC’s Meeting
The Board of Commissioners’ next Regular Meeting is scheduled on the third Tuesday of the month, November 19th
Meeting Agenda
Yet another marathon session, the meeting ran for over three (3) hours
Some Brunswick County residents will be voting at a new location this year
Election Day is less than 80 days away and if you are a Brunswick County voter then you may be taking a different route to get to the polling booths this year. WWAY caught up with the director of elections of Brunswick County, Sara Lavere on Monday who said after the primary elections they reassessed some of the polling locations. They realized that some of the locations could not accommodate the number of voters and equipment, so they changed five polling locations. She is very optimistic about this change but knows it may bring some challenges. “I think that the change will make those locations have a reduced wait time. Which is paramount when we are talking about the voter experience. You know if they have to wait in line for 45 minutes to 1 hour that really is not great. I think it will lead to some confusion.” Lavere said. To help avoid some of the possible confusion Lavere suggested checking your voter registration prior to election day and if you have questions call the main source; your county board of elections. Also, if your location is affected you will get a voter verification voter card in the mail.
Shallotte (CB02)
Previous Polling Place: The Brunswick Center at Shallotte
New Polling Place: West Brunswick High School, 550 Whiteville Rd NW, Shallotte, 28470
Secession 2 (CB04)
Previous Polling Place: Holden Beach Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Building
New Polling Place: Sabbath Home Baptist Church, 990 Sabbath Home Rd, Supply, 28462
Read more » click here
Polling place in Holden Beach moved to old location
The Brunswick County Board of Elections announced on Sept. 18 that the CB04 Secession 2 polling place will be at the Holden Beach Emergency Operations Center. “Although initial plans were made to hold the election at Sabbath Home Baptist Church, we were recently informed that the venue would no longer be available for use. As a result, the polling location for Secession 2 will now return to the Holden Beach EOC, located at 1044 Sabbath Home Rd SW, Supply, 28462,” the announcement states. Affected voters have been mailed an updated voter card, and you can look up the registration details online here.
Read more » click here
How to vote early in North Carolina’s 2024 general election
Early voting for the North Carolina primary election begins Thursday, Oct. 17 and ends at 3 p.m. on Saturday, Nov. 2. Early voting allows voters to cast their ballots at a convenient time for them, but polling locations may be different than a voter’s Election Day spot. Find the nearest polling location on the North Carolina State Board of Elections website. Each polling location has unique hours, so make sure to check before heading out to vote. Just like Election Day voting, early in-person voting requires a photo ID to cast a ballot. A common acceptable form of photo ID is a North Carolina driver’s license, but there are over five other acceptable forms of ID. To see a full list of acceptable IDs, visit the North Carolina State Board of Election website. For those without a photo ID, the board of elections is providing free photo voter ID cards. Apply for one on their website. Early in-person voting also allows for same-day registration. Learn more about who qualifies and next steps on the NCSBE website.
Read more » click here
It’s not like they don’t have anything to work on …
The following nine (9) items are what’s In the Works/Loose Ends queue:
- Accommodation/Occupancy Tax Compliance
- Audio/Video Broadcast
- Block Q Project/Carolina Avenue
- Dog Park
- Fire Station Project
- Pavilion Replacement
- Pier Properties Project
- Rights-of-Way
- USACE/Coastal Storm Risk Management Study
- Accommodation/Occupancy Tax Compliance
Upon further review we have decided to revise the Loose Ends list based on the BOC’s prioritized objectives. Frankly, it did not seem that some of the items were going to see the light of day ever again.
The definition of loose ends is a fragment of unfinished business or a detail that is not yet settled or explained, which is the current status of these items. All of these items were started and then put on hold, and they were never put back in the queue. This Board needs to continue working on them and move these items to closure.
.
Lost in the Sauce –
.
2023 –
Removing Sand from the Beach
Previously reported – October 2023
Discussion and Possible Action on Regulations for Removing Sand from the Beach – Mayor Holden
Agenda Packet –
No person, firm or corporation shall remove or cause to be removed any beach sand from its natural state, except necessary excavation in preparation for building, remodeling, or repairing the premises; provided that any beach sand so removed shall be placed nearer the road adjoining the premises or, at the option of the owner of the premises, hauled to another suitable location within the town limits, provided also that the sand dunes lying adjacent to the ocean front shall not be lowered below six feet in height above the abutting street elevation, and that in making such excavation no vegetation shall be destroyed which is growing on the front slope of the ocean front sand dune. Provided further that under no circumstances shall any quantity of beach sand be transported to a location outside the town limits.
Update –
Agenda packet included Ordinances from Caswell Beach, Ocean Isle Beach, and Sunset Beach. Alan requested that the town staff examine existing rules regarding the removal of sand from the island. He specifically requested that ordinance includes language stating that under no circumstances shall any quantity of beach sand be transported to a location outside the town limits. The Board instructed the town staff to craft an ordinance that will not allow hauling sand off the island.
2022 –
Coastal Storm Risk Management Study
Previously reported – October 2022
Discussion and Possible Action on the Corps’ Coastal Storm Risk Management Study
Agenda Packet –
Colonel Bennett, representing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, presented proposed changes in the Coastal Storm Risk Management Study duration, scope, costs, and potential funding opportunities at the September board meeting. Attached please find the letter of intent the Wilmington District would like from the Board (Attachment 1) to apply for 2019 Disaster Relief Act funding. Prior to the regular September meeting staff consulted with Ward and Smith /Ferguson Group to develop the attached draft letter of intent at Attachment 2; however, the Wilmington District has communicated “HQ would like to see full acknowledgement of the additional time and costs” (Christine Brayman ). Also included is what we have obtained since the meeting to describe actions/costs to date (Attachment 3).
Previously reported – April 2021
Presentation and Possible Action on Holden Beach Coastal Storm Risk Management Study Federal Cost Share Agreement (FCSA) – Bob Keistler, Corps (Assistant Town Manager Ferguson)
. a. Ordinance 21-09, An Ordinance Amending Ordinance 20-10, The Revenues and Appropriations Ordinance for Fiscal Year 2020 – 2021 (Amendment No. 11)
In order for us to become a USACE beach requires a new study be authorized
Three (3) years / Three (3) levels of review / Three (3) million dollars
- $1.5 million Feds and $1.5 million Town of Holden Beach
Why consider doing a study?
- FEMA is not an insurance policy
- The rule book is changing
- We have to consider risks
Coastal Storm Risk Management Study
This attached draft agreement for a Coastal Storm Risk Management Study (Attachment 1) between the USACE and the Town of Holden Beach represents the inclusion of the study in the Corps work plan for this federal fiscal year. The study was the Town’s number one advocacy priority at the federal level as a proposed means of storm damage reduction . The Town will not know if it is economically and environmentally feasible for us to become a federal beach unless the study is conducted. The attached budget amendment (Attachment 2) in the amount of $500,000 represents the town’s commitment for the upcoming FY for the Town’s share of the total non-federal (Town) study cost of $1,500,000.
If the BOC chooses to pursue the study, a motion will need to be made to authorize the Town Manager to execute the contract document and self-certification of financial capability with the USACE and approve the attached budget amendment.
Christy went through a slide presentation briefly reviewing how we got to this point. The abridged version is that FEMA continues to change the rules for engineered beaches maintenance programs. The study with the USACE gives us another option if we can’t count on FEMA moving forward. Commissioner Kwiatkowski was prepared as usual and had a number of questions for the USACE representatives that were in attendance at the meeting. The Corps representative walked them through the process. Commissioner Sullivan asked a couple additional questions regarding funding. An important takeaway is the federal government contributes 65% of the costs for initial construction, the cost split is 50% between federal and non-federal funding for maintenance nourishment projects. Of course, the major concern is whether there will be adequate funding for not only the study but for an approved project. The Corps rep made it very clear that there is no guarantee, but he felt confident that they both would be funded. He understands that the Town is looking to obtain the best deal possible. FEMA and USACE organizations are both here to help and each have a place. The difference between them is that the USACE is more of a designed project, build, and maintain whereas FEMA is primarily there to help cover emergencies. The BOC’s decided to fund the $1.5 million study and take the funds from the BPART account instead of the Capital Reserve account.
We just approved spending $1.5 million to potentially switch to USACE—wait for it—after we just received $45 million for FEMA projects. I have some reservations about making the change and was really disappointed that there was not more serious discussions prior to spending that kind of money. Just to be clear I’m for beach nourishment, but I am generally opposed to moving forward with the federal project due to the uncertainty of the funding. Congressional authorization of a project does not necessarily mean that the project will receive federal construction funds. Project authorizations over the years have far outpaced the level of federal appropriations provided. Our portion is $1.5 million just for the Storm Risk Management study, which is a huge amount of money when we don’t even know if the study will be completely funded let alone whether the project will be approved or funded.
Update –
USACE briefly reviewed the process and gave us a status update. Hat in hand, they said they are not able to get it done as presented to us; neither in the time frame three (3) years nor for the budget of three (3) million dollars. Additional work beyond what they planned is needed. They realize that they need to take other variables into consideration, and they need to address it now. Colonel Bennett stated that they were not here to advocate for or against the project but were here to communicate capability. The sooner that they get Board approval the better, it would likely be a greater opportunity to be selected. The Board allowed the public to ask any questions that they had. Town Manager will draft letter of intent and the BOC’s will discuss at the Special Meeting scheduled for September 28th.
No decision was made – No action taken
Let me get this straight we already committed $1.5 million for our portion just over one (1) year ago and now they want us to ante up another 1.25 million? The additional cost prohibits us from doing other things that we planned on doing.
Bulkheads from 796 Ocean Boulevard West through 800 Block Properties
Previously reported – October 2022
Discussion and Possible Action on Bulkheads from 796 Ocean Boulevard West through 800 Block Properties – Commissioner Murdock
Delineation study was completed, now we need to act on it. Brian stated he was looking for the Board’s thoughts on protecting those properties. This is a necessary step if we want to make use of these Town owned parcels. Timbo recommended proceeding by applying for CAMA permits for bulkheads there. David suggested Right Angle Engineering could give us the probable cost of construction. The motion was made to have the Town’s engineer, Right Angle Engineering, pursue getting CAMA permits and also to determine the height of bulkheads that are needed with the estimated cost.
A decision was made – Approved (4-1)
Commissioner Smith opposed the motion
Previously reported – March 2021
Commissioners Murdock and Tyner are recommending to the BOC that the Town appropriate funding to build parking lots on Town-owned properties in the 800 block and 764 0BW.
Editor’s Note –
The Town owns ten (10) parcels in the 800 block which we obtained on 04/21/13 ostensibly to be used for parking. They are as follows: 46BC001, 246BC010, 246BC011, 246BC012, 246BC013, 246BC014, 246BC015, 246BC016, 246BC01604, and 246BC01609.
To View Parcels » click here
Brunswick County – Basic Search
Select Parcel Number
Enter Parcel Number
Click Owner Name
Click View Map for this Parcel
Hurricane Season
For more information » click here.
Be prepared – have a plan!
NOAA predicts above-normal 2024 Atlantic hurricane season
Read more » click here
Brunswick County reminds public to prepare for 2024 Atlantic hurricane season
Read more » click here
A Once-Dormant Hurricane Season Is Spinning Into Action
Technically, the hurricane season has fallen short of the “hyperactive” forecast, but in some ways it hasn’t.
There are just under two months left before the official Atlantic hurricane season ends in November, and with millions of people across the Southeast United States still assessing the damage of Hurricane Helene and two more storms churning at sea, experts are warning it isn’t over yet. It may even last into December. What was expected to be a “hyperactive” hurricane season has turned out to be only average by the start of October. It may not have felt average to anyone who lives in the Southeast, where, in addition to Helene, three other hurricanes have already made landfall this year. But in a typical hurricane season in the United States, two or three hurricanes make landfall; in the busiest year on record, 2020, there were six. “So, in some ways, it’s been busy, and in some ways, it hasn’t been busy,” said Matthew Rosencrans, the lead forecaster for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s seasonal hurricane outlook. His organization was one of many this spring that predicted an abnormally busy season. In May, NOAA said it expected 17 to 25 named tropical cyclones, eight to 13 of which would become hurricanes. An updated assessment in August, issued during a long lull in storms, held generally the same forecast. As of Friday, there have been 12 named storms this year, and eight have become hurricanes. October and November typically calm down slightly. When graphed, an average season looks like a tall mountain with a solid peak of activity at the beginning of September. But seasonal hurricane experts like Phil Klotzbach at Colorado State University believe this year will instead bring three hurricane seasons: “A busy start, a super-quiet peak and a busy finish,” he said. When graphed, this season will look like two mountain peaks with a distinct valley in the center. In early July, Hurricane Beryl, the earliest major hurricane to form in a season, was the first hurricane to land in the United States, lashing Houston with damaging winds and bringing warnings of what was to come this season. Then came Debby, which flooded Florida, Georgia and the Carolina coasts in early August. Then, after Hurricane Ernesto, the Atlantic went quiet. There was nothing for weeks at what was supposed to be the height of the season. Forecasters who had warned of the worst began questioning their expectations and looking for explanations for the lull. Scientists are already trying to diagnose what happened, in hopes of informing future forecasts and better preparing coastal residents. One possible explanation is that the African Monsoon, a weather pattern that can spin up storms off Africa’s west coast, was too far north. Instead of moving over warm tropical water, this year’s storms hit cooler conditions that were less conducive to helping them form. Another hypothesis is that the air was too warm at higher levels, which meant that the already warmer air at the surface of the ocean couldn’t rise up to form thunderstorms. Then, almost overnight, just after the midpoint of hurricane season in mid-September, the lull broke. Francine formed and hit Louisiana, and not far behind it were more: Gordon, Kirk, and Leslie, which churned generally harmlessly in the middle of the Atlantic. The worst was Helene last week, which rapidly intensified in the Gulf of Mexico, striking the Florida shores as the strongest hurricane to ever hit the state’s Big Bend coastline. Its tropical downpours dropped over two feet of rain on parts of the Appalachian Mountains, causing widespread destruction. Despite the quick succession of recent storms, “we’re probably a little behind where I would have expected to be at the beginning of the season, given the outlook we had,” Mr. Rosencrans said. When Leslie formed this week, the season officially became average, at least as far as the number of overall storms. But of the named storms, 66 percent have become hurricanes. So, the average season may yet have an above-average number of hurricanes. Even though the total storm count is likely to be lower than forecasters predicted in the spring, details this year have surprised them. Historically, in October, a storm is much more likely to form in the Caribbean Sea or the Gulf of Mexico than in the eastern Atlantic. But Hurricane Kirk and Leslie, became a hurricane late Friday night, have done just that, forming off the coast of Africa and moving through Atlantic waters this week. Dr. Klotzbach called that “impressive.” “The conditions that would make this an above-normal season, the warm sea surface temperatures, the coming of La Niña, are still in place,” Mr. Rosencrans said. An average year could produce three named storms in October and one in November. So, another five or six storms are not out of the question, he added, and this would be close to the lower end of NOAA’s forecast of 17. The hurricane season officially ends on Nov. 30. Still, Mr. Rosencrans cautions that during the La Niña years, with warm sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic, the active season can last into December. That happened in 2005 when Hurricane Epsilon formed in late November and stretched into the first week of December and then Tropical Storm Zeta formed at the end of the year, lasting into the first week of 2006.
Read more » click here
Hurricane season isn’t over yet.
Here’s why North Carolina residents need to stay vigilant.
Despite tropical storm-induced flooding in the mountains and along the coast, experts say NC isn’t out of the woods yet as hurricane season drags on
First Tropical Storm Debby, a slow-moving storm that trudged up the East Coast in early August before making a second landfall along the central South Carolina coast, drenched the Cape Fear region with more than 15 inches of rain in places. A little more than a month later, an unnamed storm that wasn’t deemed a big enough threat to close many schools swamped parts of southern New Hanover County and much of Brunswick County with another massive deluge. The nearly 20 inches of rain in some areas caused extensive flash flooding, collapsed roads, and destroyed several bridges. Then Tropical Storm Helene blew into the state three weeks ago, pummeling Asheville and the North Carolina mountains. The record-setting rainfall, more than 18 inches in some places, washed out roads and bridges, knocked out power to nearly 2 million people in the Carolinas − with 14,000 N.C. customers still without power as of Wednesday, and killed at least 95 people in the state with dozens still unaccounted for. North Carolina has been hammered on both ends of the state by tropical weather systems this year, making 2024 one of the worst hurricane seasons the state has seen in a long time. And while it might be mid-October and temperatures are already beginning to fall, experts warn that the Tar Heel State needs to stay on alert for another possible visit from Mother Nature. Several factors are contributing to officials’ concerns, but chief among them is the impact climate change is having on temperatures and weather patterns. “So, no, we are definitely not out of the woods for this season,” said Dr. Michael Mann, a meteorologist and scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, in an email.
Does North Carolina get late-season hurricanes?
On Oct. 15, 1954, Hurricane Hazel made landfall near the North Carolina/South Carolina state line. The storm remains the only Category 4 hurricane to ever hit the Carolinas. After wiping clean some of the Brunswick County barrier islands with storm surge that exceeded 18 feet in places, the monster storm barreled inland at speeds of more than 50 mph. That allowed Hazel to bring hurricane-force winds well inland, to places like Fayetteville, Raleigh and Goldsboro. While Hazel might be a bit of an outlier, it isn’t the only storm that has impacted North Carolina late in hurricane season. Others include 2012’s Hurricane Sandy, which brought substantial overwash to the Outer Banks and nearly a foot of snow to the N.C. mountains in late October, and 2018’s Tropical Storm Michael that left more than 400,000 without power and flooded many coastal communities. Hurricane Matthew also hit the state in October 2016, flooding nearly 100,000 structures across much of Eastern North Carolina and causing billions in damages. Remnants of tropical systems that form and then fall apart farther south also can wander north and impact parts of the state, especially coastal areas as they ride the Gulf Stream north.
How is the rest of the 2024 hurricane season shaping up?
As of Wednesday, the National Hurricane Center was tracking two tropical disturbances in the Atlantic basin, with the one in the mid-South Atlantic on track to hit the northern Caribbean and then potentially Florida. If it strengthens enough, it would become Tropical Storm Nadine. They are unlikely to be the last systems of the season to attract the attention of meteorologists. Before hurricane season officially began June 1, officials were expressing concern over how bad it might be. With climate change warming the oceans and air temperatures seemingly hitting new highs every month, they said it really was only a question of just how brutal the season would be. But for most of the summer, aside from Beryl, which was a rare major June hurricane, the reality on the ground seemed to confound the predictions, with Saharan dust blowing off Africa helping limit storm formation for much of June, July and into August. Then Debby, Ernesto, Francine and Helene came barreling ashore − not to mention the no-name storm that pummeled Southeastern North Carolina. Mann said conditions remain ripe for more storm activity. He said sea surface temperatures remain very warm, largely a result of heat-trapping gasses pumped into the atmosphere tied to human activity. Warmer ocean water helps fuel storms, allowing them to intensify more quickly and grow bigger and stronger. They also can hold their strength longer and travel farther inland, and hotter ocean temperatures allow them to travel farther north, striking areas that aren’t used to seeing raging hurricanes on the horizon. Mann said we’re also still transitioning toward a La Niña climate pattern. That will mean decreased wind shear in the tropical Atlantic and a more favorable environment for tropical cyclones. “That combination of factors tends to lead to very late seasons,“ Mann said. “2005 is the definitive example, where we saw named storms into the new year.” The record-setting 2005 hurricane season included 28 named storms and 15 hurricanes. Four of those reached Category 5 strength, and seven of the storms formed in October, another three in November. Although hurricane season is supposed to end Nov. 30, the 2005 season continued until Jan. 6 and was so busy the National Hurricane Center had to use the Greek alphabet to name some of the storms. Infamous storms from that season included Hurricanes’ Katrina, Rita and Wilma. Another storm, Hurricane Ophelia, raked much of the N.C. coast, causing significant coastal flooding and erosion.
Read more » click here
As hurricane seasons worsen, taxpayers subsidize people to live in risky areas
Helene and Milton spotlight a federal flood insurance program drowning in debt.
Hurricane Helene likely caused more than $30 billion worth of damage. Less than two weeks later, Hurricane Milton inflicted almost $50 billion more. With six weeks left in this hurricane season, the Small Business Administration’s disaster loan program is already out of money. And more tropical storms are swirling over the Atlantic. Who pays for all of this? Because private home insurers generally find this sector of the business unprofitable, the federal National Flood Insurance Program shoulders the burden of providing homeowners inundation coverage — and it has problems. The NFIP is managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency — the same body fighting misinformation and dodging vigilantes as it tries to distribute much-needed aid to the victims of Helene and Milton. The program provides nearly $1.3 trillion in coverage to more than 5 million policyholders. It’s funded by the premiums collected from policyholders but borrows from the U.S. treasury when claims it’s obligated to pay outpace revenue, as is often the case. Congress canceled $16 billion in NFIP debt in 2017; since then, the program has borrowed billions more from taxpayers. If Helene and Milton epitomized how destructive hurricanes are becoming in a warming world, the NFIP’s financial woes will only worsen. And yet Congress has made no fundamental reforms to the program since its inception nearly six decades ago. That cannot continue. Congress created the NFIP when private insurers retreated from the flood insurance market after the first storm to cause $1 billion in losses: Hurricane Betsy in 1965. The government stepped in with two conditions, which were intended to avoid “moral hazard,” the phenomenon whereby insuring against a particular risk encourages more people to take it. It required communities to adopt land-use policies that discouraged development in flood-prone areas, and it mandated that homeowners pay “actuarially sound” premiums. Moral hazard took hold anyway, as developers and other real estate interests gamed the system to suppress premiums and permit building in low-lying areas and beachfronts exposed to storms. The upshot is that FEMA flood hazard maps that determine coverage today rely on outdated information so inaccurate that more than 40 percent of NFIP claims made from 2017 to 2019 were for properties outside official flood hazard zones or in areas the agency had not mapped at all. Heavily lobbied by the interested industries, Congress has taken little action to rectify these long-standing issues, which have been festering for decades. Since the end of fiscal 2017, it has enacted 31 short-term NFIP reauthorizations, including the most recent extension through Dec. 20. The one attempt at genuine reform in recent history — the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 — would have ended subsidized rates for second homes and properties that repeatedly flooded. After Hurricane Sandy, however, coastal-state representatives reversed even these modest improvements. Despite congressional inaction, FEMA took one step in the right direction on its own by implementing its Risk Rating 2.0 pricing methodology. The agency now uses data from private insurers to charge policyholders rates based on variables that more accurately gauge flood risk. But to be solvent and continue providing coverage to homeowners, the NFIP needs larger-scale reforms that require legislative action. Ideally, modern data collection and risk mapping should enable private insurers to resume issuing flood insurance rather than leave the business entirely to the government. In the likely event that doesn’t happen, Congress should at least reinstate the 2012 law’s bans on subsidized premiums for second homes and properties that have been rebuilt multiple times. As climate change raises risks to more areas, investing in updated flood maps would also bring a more fitting geographic region under the NFIP’s purview. That, in turn, would enable stronger enforcement of building standards and tougher flood-risk building requirements. And even if private industry didn’t offer policies directly to consumers, more accurate pricing would help the NFIP appeal to private insurers, which might then share some of the risk by offering “reinsurance” — essentially, insurance protecting insurers, in this case NFIP, from high costs. Still, premiums greatly lag behind risk assessments. Congress should enable FEMA to build on the Risk Rating 2.0 pricing model, adjusting rates to reflect actual risk. Yes, more accurate pricing might raise some homeowners’ premiums. But this necessary step will help the program become fiscally stable and provide coverage in the coming years. It’s simply unfair to ask the entire population to provide deep subsidies for properties that, by definition, only a portion of Americans can occupy and enjoy.
Read more » click here
Do you enjoy this newsletter?
Then please forward it to a friend!
Lou’s Views . HBPOIN
. • Gather and disseminate information
. • Identify the issues and determine how they affect you
. • Act as a watchdog
. • Grass roots monthly newsletter since 2008
News from Town of Holden Beach 
Epic flooding in North Carolina’s ‘own Hurricane Katrina’
11 things to know about offshore wind farms in North Carolina and the United States
Free Cleanup Week
Rights-of-Way