Lou’s Views
“Unofficial” Minutes & Comments
BOC’s Regular Meeting 10/27/26
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet » click here
Audio Recording » click here
1. Ceremonial Recognition of Former Police Chief Jeremy Dixon for his Years of Dedicated Service to the Town of Holden Beach – Holden Beach Police Department
Agenda Packet – background information was not provided
Previously reported – February 2026
Chief Dixon will be leaving at the end of February to take the place of the retiring chief in Shallotte
Chief Dixon addressed the community with a heartfelt emotional farewell message expressing his appreciation for the time that he had spent here.
Previously reported – January 2026
HBPD Chief Dixon hired as Shallotte PD chief
The town of Shallotte last week announced it has hired current Holden Beach Police Chief Jeremy Dixon to replace outgoing Shallotte Police Chief Adam Stanley, who will retire in February. During the Jan. 6 Shallotte Board of Aldermen meeting, Chief Stanley announced that Chief Dixon had been selected to take his place. “My last day will be Feb. 2 — after 30 years of service, I’m retiring,” Stanley said. “The town has selected Chief Jeremy Dixon [as the new police chief]. He’s currently the chief of Holden Beach [Police Department] and he is a resident of Shallotte, who has been here 20-some years. He will be taking my place in March, and we are glad to have him.” The town of Shallotte in November announced Stanley would be retiring from his role as police chief, which he has held since 2022. The town in December conducted interviews for the police chief position prior to announcing Dixon’s hiring last week. The town of Holden Beach, on Wednesday, Jan. 7, announced it is accepting applications for the Holden Beach Police Chief position. Applications are due to the town by Feb. 2, the announcement noted. The Holden Beach Board of Commissioners is expected to discuss the vacancy during its Jan. 20 meeting.
Read more » click here
Update –
Chief Barger recognized former Police Chief Dixon for his many years of dedicated service to the community. Steve presented Jeremy with a commemorative shadow box on behalf of the Police Department. The presentation was followed by a photo-op with the members of the Police Department in attendance.
Chief Barger also presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Detective Jessica Camara from the West End HOA in appreciation and recognition for her exemplary service and dedication to the community.
2. Consent Agenda Items
a) Police Report – Chief Barger
Agenda Packet – pages 9 – 16
Police Report » click here
b) Inspections Department Report – Inspections Director Evans
Agenda Packet – pages 17 – 20
Inspections Report » click here
c) Finance Department Report – Finance Officer McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 21 – 26
Finance Report » click here
d) Public Works Department Report – Public Works Director Benton
Agenda Packet – pages 27 – 29
Public Works Report » click here
The Board approved the consent agenda items
3. Discussion and Possible Action on Underwater Survey Report and Building and Inspections’ Letter of Formal Condemnation – Town Manager Chadwick
Agenda Packet – page 30 – 31, plus separate packet
Pier Documents » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Underwater Survey Report and Building and Inspections’ Letter of Formal Condemnation
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
At the July 21st meeting, the BOC approved the contract for MidAtlantic Engineering Partners to perform an underwater inspection of the below substructure elements of the Town pier. They have completed the Final Report and are available via Zoom for questions. Since the Final Report was completed, the Building and Inspections Director utilized that document and has completed an assessment of the upper structure. He delivered a formal letter to the Town on October 12th condemning the pier structure. This action sets a timeline to take some sort of corrective action. Staff is seeking guidance on what “next steps” you would like to take.
10/12/2026
Mr. Bryan Chadwick, Town Manager
Ms. Heather Finnell, Town Clerk Town of Holden Beach
110 Rothschild Street Holden Beach, NC 28462
Formal Condemnation of the Holden Beach Fishing Pier
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D- 1119
441 Ocean Boulevard West, Holden Beach, NC
Based on MidAtlantic Engineering Partners Underwater Inspection Report dated October 8, 2026 (Project No. HLD-2601) and Separate Chief Building Official Assessment of Upper Structure
Dear Mr. Chadwick and Ms. Finnell:
As Planning & Inspections Director for the Town of Holden Beach, and pursuant to the authority granted under Article 11 of Chapter 160D of the North Carolina General Statutes (Building Code Enforcement), I have reviewed the October 8, 2026, underwater inspection report prepared by MidAtlantic Engineering Partners for the timber substructure of the Holden Beach Fishing Pier. Separately, and outside the scope of that engineer’s report, I have assessed the upper structure based on field photographs and visual inspection. Based on these findings, I hereby determine that the pier appears especially dangerous to life and shall be held to be unsafe under N.C.G.S. § 160D-1119(a).
Statutory Authority
N.C.G.S. § 160D-1119(a) provides:
“Every building that shall appear to the inspector to be especially dangerous to life because of its liability to fire or because of bad condition of walls, overloaded floors, defective construction, decay, unsafe wiring or heating systems, inadequate means of egress, or other causes shall be held to be unsafe, and the inspector shall affix a notice of the dangerous character of the structure to a conspicuous place on the exterior wall of the building. The statute further provides procedures for notice . administrative hearing, and orders to repair, close. vacate, or demolish under N.C.G.S. § 160D-1121 and § 160D-1122 in the event corrective action is not promptly taken.
Findings Supporting Condemnation
The MidAtlantic Engineering Partners report (October 8, 2026, Project HLD-2601) assigns an overall Condition Assessment Rating (CAR) of Poor and documents widespread major-to-severe defects in the timber substructure. Separately and outside the scope of the MidAtlantic engineer’s report, field photographs and a visual assessment of the upper structure (decking, supporting top members, guardrail system, and fasteners) performed by the Chief Building Official document extensive additional deterioration. These upper-structure conditions further demonstrate defective construction, decay. and deterioration that render the structure especially dangerous to life under N.C.G.S. § 160D-1119(a).
Substructure defects documented in the MidAtlantic report include:
Multiple timber piles rated Severe or Major , including Pile 17A ( l00% non-bearing; cap supported solely by fishplates), Pile 52A (75% non-bearing due to split), Piles 25B and 40A (50% non-bearing due to splits), Pile 528 (marine borer damage with >75% section loss), Pile – 5A (heavy rot with >75% section loss) . and Pile 49A (broken approximately 7 feet from the top).
-
- Sixteen (16) diagonal braces rated Severe as broken and/or
- Heavy corrosion of lower-elevation hardware with 50- 75% section
- Two pile caps (Bents 26 and 27) rated Major due to heavy end-grain rot with 35 -50% section
Additional obvious deterioration of supporting top members, decking, guardrail system, and fasteners observed outside the MidAtlantic report (based on field photographs and Chief Building Official assessment) includes:
-
- Advanced weathering, checking, splitting, and surface decay of timber pile caps, beams, and joists that support the decking, with visible gaps and loss of bearing at multiple pile to-cap
- Heavily corroded and deteriorated fasteners, bolts, washers, and connection hardware throughout the upper structure, exhibiting extensive rust, section loss, and staining that compromise connection
- Weathered and deteriorated timber decking boards and supporting members visible from below, showing checking, cracking, and long-term exposure
- Guardrail system components and associated connections showing weathering, corrosion of fasteners, and general deterioration consistent with prolonged marine
- Split and decayed ends of timber members at connection points, with evidence of displacement and reduced load transfer
- Overall advanced weathering of the timber structure above the pile caps, including faded, checked, and eroded surfaces on horizontal and diagonal
- At the low tide line, a measured 1.5-foot racking of the top of the structure, both vertically and horizontally and racked parallel of center, indicating a complete failure of alignment and structural continuity at that
These upper-structure conditions, identified independently of and outside the MidAtlantic engineer’s report, when combined with the documented substructure defects, constitute defective construction and decay within the meaning of N.C.G.S. § 160D-1119(a). The structure is exposed to direct ocean wave action, and the combination of non-bearing and broken piles, missing lateral bracing, severely corroded fasteners, deteriorated top members, and the 1.5-foot racking at the low tide line creates an unacceptable risk of progressive structural failure. The pier remains closed due to these safety concerns.
The MidAtlantic report identifies recommended substructure repairs with a Class S Opinion of Probable Cost of approximately $677,795. Based on the Chief Building Official’s assessment of the upper structure (decking, supporting member, guardrail system, and fasteners), an additional Class 5 Opinion of Probable Cost of $500,000 is estimated for necessary repair to the upper structure. These upper-structure deficiencies and the associated cost estimate were developed outside the scope of the MidAtlantic report. The combined Class 5 Opinion of Probable Cost of approximately $1,177.795 must be addressed, along with proper engineered design, permits, and inspections, prior to any return of the pier to service.
Action Taken and Recommended Next Steps
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D-1119(a), I am directing that a notice of the dangerous character of the structure be affixed to a conspicuous place on the pier. The pier shall remain closed to all public access and use.
I further recommend that the Board of Commissioners be advised of this determination and that the Town proceed under the procedures of N.C.G.S. § 160D-1121 and § 160D-1122, as necessary. Given that the Town is the owner of the structure, any order to repair, close, or take other corrective action will be directed accordingly. No reopening of the pier should occur until the structural deficiencies identified in the MidAtlantic report and the additional upper-structure conditions documented separately by the Chief Building Official have been fully remediated under proper engineered design, permits, and inspections, and the structure has been verified as no longer unsafe.
Please place this determination, the MidAtlantic report, and the supporting field photographs on the agenda of the Board of Commissioners for formal acknowledgment and direction regarding next steps.
I am available to discuss these findings or the statutory process in greater detail.
Respectfully. Timothy D Evans, Planning and Inspections Director.
Previously reported – March 2025
HDR Executive Summary » click here
Previously reported – April 2025
HDR Condition Assessment » click here
After reviewing the qualifications, the Board selected MidAtlantic Engineering Firm to assess the underwater structure, including the pilings, of the pier. Commissioner Myers noted that this represents a shift from the previous plan to build a new pier to repairing the existing pier. He reminded the Board that HDR Engineering Firm had previously advised that, over the long term, repairs could be more costly. Commissioner Smith stated that the objective is to determine the condition of the pier pilings and the estimated cost of repairs so the Board can decide how to proceed.
Editor’s note –
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is a document that asks potential suppliers or vendors to detail their background and experience providing a specific good or service. In this case, the buyer is only concerned about the vendor’s skills and experience. Professionals responding will be selected solely based on their qualifications and not on price. Once a firm is selected the Town will negotiate a contract for the desired services. Therefore, the response is not a bid.

The HDR report clearly concludes that repairing the existing pier is not cost-effective. The structure has reached the end of its useful life, so any repairs would be temporary while still requiring substantial upfront and ongoing maintenance costs. From a fiscal responsibility standpoint, investing significant funds in a structure that will need continual repairs and eventual replacement is difficult to justify and risks throwing good money after bad. HDR made a strong effort to explain to the Board why repairs are not in the Town’s best interest. This is not only a financial issue: on five separate occasions, public input has shown insufficient support for a pier. Ignoring both the financial realities and repeated public feedback raises serious concerns about priorities and decision-making. Although other funding sources continue to be discussed, no funding has been identified to repair or replace the pier under either option.
Previously reported – June 2026
Proposals Pier Underwater Study » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action on responses for an engineering firm to perform an underwater study for the pier.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town issued an RFQ for engineering services to perform an underwater inspection of the below substructure elements of the Town pier. The RFQs were submitted on June I 0, 2026 and are included with the agenda packet. Staff will review and have a recommendation at the meeting.
A motion was made to approve the contract with MidAtlantic Engineering for the pier underwater inspection, subject to Town Attorney edits. The underwater study is necessary to determine whether the Town can proceed with repair options.
Previously reported – July 2026
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action approving the contract with MidAtlantic Engineering Partners.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
At the June 16th meeting, the BOC approved engaging with MidAtlantic Engineering Partners for engineering services to perform an underwater inspection of the below substructure elements of the Town pier. The proposed contract price is $47,144.50 for these services. MidAtlantic anticipates completing the underwater inspection, engineering evaluation, cost estimating, and final inspection report within forty-five (45) calendar days of Notice to Proceed, subject to weather conditions and site accessibility.
The base scope of work, consisting of Tasks I through 4 as described in the RFQ and our technical proposal (project preparation/administration, mobilization/demobilization, field work, and preparation of the underwater inspection report), is proposed at a total fee of $47,144.50
Update –
The Planning and Inspections Director’s letter formally declares the Holden Beach Fishing Pier unsafe and prohibits reopening until repairs, engineering, permits, inspections, and safety verification are complete. After repeatedly debating whether to repair or replace the pier, the Board appears to have accepted the need for action. Tonight, it reluctantly made the difficult but necessary decision to demolish the existing pier while applying for a replacement permit, with the understanding that a new pier will be built.
A motion was made to secure the pier and address any identified safety concerns, issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the demolition of the existing pier, and submit the necessary permit application for construction of a replacement pier.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
A motion was made to direct the Town Manager, in coordination with staff, to research and present options for the future use and development of the pier property. This would include exploring partnerships with colleges or universities that may be able to assist with evaluating potential uses and conducting the necessary research. Additionally, staff will investigate the process, requirements, and potential costs associated with pursuing an economic impact study of the pier property.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
.
The three official engineering and inspection documents received by the Town (HDR’s assessment, MidAtlantic Engineering’s underwater inspection, and the Town’s building inspectors condemnation letter) raise serious questions about whether repairing the existing pier is a responsible use of public funds. The Board requested a complete repair cost before making a decision. Yet the Town still lacks a comprehensive, engineering-based estimate of the total cost required to restore the pier. MidAtlantic’s estimate of $677,795 covers only the substructure piles and bracing, excluding all work above the pilings. The building inspector’s $500,000 deck estimate is based on a visual assessment rather than a detailed construction calculation. Furthermore, the repair figures presented are Class 5 Opinions of Probable Cost, intended for preliminary planning purposes, not as definitive estimates of actual construction costs. MidAtlantic also cautions that additional structural work will likely be necessary within five to eight years, even if the proposed repairs are completed. In January 2024, after two rounds of bidding, the Town received only two bids for phase one of the project: $2.2 million and $3.9 million. Bids are firm commitments, these actual bids provide a far more compelling indication of potential construction costs than the current preliminary repair estimates, which total approximately $1.18 million. Given the substantial increase in construction costs since then, the work that is excluded from the current estimates, and the likelihood of additional repairs in the years ahead, a realistic total cost could readily exceed $3 million. The Town should not commit public funds based on preliminary figures that may significantly understate the true financial obligation. Regulatory requirements also warrant careful review. If the proposed work exceeds the applicable North Carolina’s Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) replacement threshold, the project could trigger permitting requirements and standards applicable to a new pier. The Town must obtain a clear determination of the applicable regulatory requirements before proceeding with repairs that could ultimately prove uneconomical or require additional permitting. The real question is whether spending millions on of taxpayer dollars in an aging pier built on a 1950s foundation will deliver a safe, durable public asset, or merely extend the structures service life for a limited period before further costly work becomes necessary. That answer must rest on sound engineering, realistic construction costs, and life-cycle cost comparisons of repair versus replacement. The Board should formally abandon plans to repair the existing pier and direct the Town’s resources toward evaluating, planning, a replacement pier that will serve our community for generations to come. The pier’s history and sentimental value are understandable, and its importance to the community should not be dismissed. But sentiment cannot justify an open-ended financial commitment without adequate evidence that repairs represent the best long-term investment for taxpayers. The Town owes its residents a decision grounded in facts, fiscal accountability, and public safety, not a desire to preserve the structure at any cost.

4. Update Regarding the Planned Canal Dredging Project for 2026 – Assistant Town Manager Ferguson
Agenda Packet – pages 32 – 38
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Update regarding the planned canal dredging project for 2026.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Last month, an update was provided regarding the planned dredge event and action was taken on submitting a grant to the Division of Water Resources. At the October meeting, an update will be provided on current challenges including permissions to cross property, the grant, and the Corps’ documents and timeline for review.
Previously reported – September 2026
Water Resources Development Grant
Resolution 26-10 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Update regarding the planned canal dredging project for 2026 and consideration and possible action on paths forward.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town Manager has been expressing for several months that we are working with the Corps regarding a cost to utilize DA292 for dredge spoil disposal. This presentation will highlight paths forward and discuss options.
Staff has been working behind the scenes on several issues and has identified three potential paths to move the canal dredging project forward. Christy stated that the Town needs to address the grant now and enter the queue to meet the November environmental window. Dredging and spoil-area costs have increased significantly, and several steps must still be completed for dredging to occur this year. Resolution 26-10 requests $1,878,750 in financial assistance from the state, representing 75% of the project construction cost. A motion was made to submit the grant and approve a revised version of Resolution 26-10.
Update –
Christy discussed the various restraining forces preventing them from moving forward with the canal dredging project. Unfortunately, it is not likely that the project will occur this winter. They are doing everything they can to make it happen and will continue to communicate the process to the public.
5. Discussion and Possible Action on Amendments to Paid Parking Program – Town Clerk Finnell
a) Otto Connect Contract Amendment 4
b) Resolution 26-11, Resolution Amending the Holden Beach Fee Schedule
c) Ordinance 26-06, An Ordinance Amending the HB Code of Ordinances, Title VII Traffic Code
Agenda Packet – pages 39 – 45
Resolution 26-11 » click here
Ordinance 26-06 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Amendments to the Paid Parking Program.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Board expressed interest in providing free parking November 1st through January 2nd . In order to move forward with altering the schedule, the Board would need to approve Contract Amendment 4 with Otto Connect and Resolution 26- 11, Resolution Amending the Holden Beach Fee Schedule. Staff is proposing the removal of the Parking Zone and Area Table from the Code of Ordinances. This would allow the town manager or his designee to make any necessary adjustments to the table without the need to adopt an ordinance. Additional changes proposed are to add the definition of low speed vehicle; clarify language in Section 72.03 (c) to eliminate confusion with side-by-sides; and clarify language regarding reduced fines in Section 72.99 (c). If the Board would like to move forward with the changes, the suggested motion is to approve Ordinance 26-06, Resolution 26-11 and Otto Connect Contract Amendment 4.
Previously reported – January 2026
Editor’s note –
Holden Beach
Gross revenue: $1,188,392
Total parked vehicles: 66,659
As of Oct. 8, 2025, the town of Holden Beach has generated a total net revenue of $803,148 from its paid parking program, Varner said on Oct. 21. Varner said he expects the town to make $880,000 by the end of the year. This will be a small bump from the nearly $830,000 made in 2024, per Varner’s presentation.
The town of Holden Beach first implemented paid parking in 2022. Originally, the town enacted seasonal paid parking from April 1 to Oct. 31 with rates of $3 per hour, $15 per day, $60 per week, or $125 per year. In 2023 and 2024, the town increased parking rates to $5 per hour, $20 per day, $80 per week and $175 for a single vehicle annual pass and transitioned to year-round paid parking.
OTTO Connect counted a total of 66,659 vehicles parked on the island so far this year, a decrease of nearly 81,000 vehicles counted in 2024. Over 26,000 vehicles were counted in parking spaces in June and July alone.
Brunswick County paid parking programs in 2025
Holden Beach Year-round
Oak Island April 1st to September 30th
Ocean Isle Beach April 1st to October 31st
Sunset Beach April 1st to October 31st
2025 – Paid Parking Revenue
January $54,561
February $49,404
March $81,713
April $100,051
May $105,148
June $137,738
July $127,309
August $96,236
September $50,288
October $27,378
November $23,010
December $27,300
Previously reported – February 2026
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action to Change Paid Parking Enforcement Dates
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
At the January meeting, it was asked that staff bring back information concerning paid parking. Several commissioners requested to discuss the dates paid parking is enforced within Town limits.
They discussed potential changes for the parking program. If we planned on suspending paid parking from November through March we are talking about reducing paid parking revenue by $235,988, a 26.81% reduction in revenue from this program, which is pretty significant. I was surprised when Keith suggested a reasonable comprise to just eliminate paid parking in November and December; which would still reduce the revenue by $50,310. He claims that this is to benefit residences and property owners of Holden Beach. After some discussion they decided they would review this item during the budget process.
Their main talking point was that this change is intended to benefit the residents and property owners of Holden Beach. “Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining”! I seriously question whether eliminating paid parking truly benefits property owners. The Town still faces significant costs to provide necessary services. By having Otto handle parking enforcement, our police officers are freed up to focus on more pressing matters. Part of the narrative suggests that owners and their guests want to use paid parking areas without paying, but every property on the island is within walking distance of a beach access. If someone wishes to visit another part of the island, parking is a reasonable $5 per hour. Let’s be clear: are we really willing to forgo $50K in revenue just so a handful of households can avoid parking fees? This strategy is difficult to justify, as it remains unclear how such actions would benefit the majority of island property owners. In reality, it appears to primarily serve the interests of mainland residents rather than those who actually own property on the island.
Previously reported – September 2026
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Parking Revenue
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Board discussed altering the parking schedules for November through January 2nd during the budget process. If after discussion the Board would like to move forward with any changes, an amended contract with Otto Connect and a resolution to update the fee schedule will be presented at the October meeting.
The Town Manager noted that the approved budget already includes a $50,000 reduction for waiving parking fees in November and December, along with an additional $40,000 reduction based on projected trends. Revenues are currently down $41,000. A motion was made for staff to bring back the required documents at the next Regular Meeting.
The Board claims that eliminating paid parking benefits Holden Beach residents and property owners. I disagree; that argument does not hold up. Once again, their narrative suggests that property owners want free use of paid parking areas and that there is no other way to accommodate them. However, every island property is within walking distance of a beach access, and parking elsewhere on the island costs only $5 per hour. Giving up $50,000 in Town revenue so a few households can avoid minimum parking fees is difficult to justify, especially if the primary benefit goes to mainland residents.
Update –
The Board moved forward with providing free parking from November 1st through January 2nd. The remaining changes were routine housekeeping measures. Commissioner Myers questioned how the policy benefits property owners and could not support it without knowing who would benefit. He suggested alternatives to explore if the intent were to benefit Holden Beach property owners. In response, supporters said adopting year-round paid parking had been a mistake and described free parking as a gesture of public goodwill. A motion was made to approve all three items as submitted.
A decision was made – Approved (4-1)
Commissioner Myers opposed the motion
Paid parking was introduced in 2022 and operated from April 1st through October 31st. In March 2024, a motion was introduced and approved to extend the season and charge for parking year-round. Supporters argued that the town’s expenses continue throughout the year. Opponents maintained that the promised services have not yet been provided and that year-round fees should wait until those commitments are fulfilled. My perspective was that I do not believe the paid parking program should operate year-round. The public should be able to access the beach without charge for at least part of the year. I originally supported free parking for at least part of the year, so I am not opposed to it. My concern now is that the policy is presented as benefiting property owners when it does not.
6. Discussion and Possible Action on Resolution 26-12, Operation Green Light for Veterans – Assistant Town Manager Ferguson
Agenda Packet – pages 46 – 47
Resolution 26-12 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Resolution recognizing Operation Green Light.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
As a community that honors and supports our veterans, we would like to take the opportunity to adopt a resolution and participate, along with the County, in the program.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution and participate in the program.
America’s counties have a long and proud history of serving our nation’s veterans, a legacy that continues to this day as we work with our federal, state and local partners to ensure that the former service members have access to the resources they need to thrive. This Veteran’s Day, the National Association of Counties (NACo) and the National Association of County Veterans Service Officers (NACVSO) invite the nation’s 3,069 counties, parishes, and boroughs to join us in showing support for veterans by lighting our buildings green from November 4-11, 2026. By shining a green light, county governments and our residents will let veterans know that they are seen, appreciated and supported.
For more information » click here
Update –
A motion was made to adopt the resolution and participate in the program.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
7. Discussion and Possible Approval to Apply for Resilient Coastal Communities Program and to Make Application Through Phase 3 and Phase 4 for Available Grant Funding – Inspections Director Evans
Agenda Packet – page 48
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval to apply for Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP) and to make application through Phases 3 and Phases 4 for available Grant Funding.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town Staff and selected engineers, along with its Community Action Team have identified and prioritized their top five projects and are preparing to make applications for funding. These are zero matched funds and must be nature based in design.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Move forward with staff recommendation to make application for funding.
Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP)
The workshop is scheduled to be held on September 24th
Previously reported – August 2026
Meetings have been held with the engineer, grant administrator, and CAT team
They are still identifying possible projects that qualify
Previously reported – July 2026
Survey is on Town website to help identify potential projects
Previously reported – June 2026
We are in Phase 2 which includes the following: Planning, Project Identification, and Prioritization
Previously reported – May 2026
The Town is currently participating in the 2025 – 2026 cycle of the North Carolina Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP). The RCCP is a community-based initiative that greatly benefits from involvement, engagement and feedback among local stakeholders. Click here to view details on the program.
Previously reported – April 2025
N.C. Resilient Coastal Communities Program » click here
The RCCP is a four-phase program designed to:
-
- Address local barriers to coastal resilience, including limited capacity, economic constraints, and social inequities .
- Assist communities in conducting risk and vulnerability assessments to create a prioritized portfolio of resilience
- Advance coastal resilience projects through engineering and design to achieve shovel ready
- Link communities with funding sources for project
The four phases are :
-
- Phase 1: Community Engagement and Risk & Vulnerability Assessment
- Phase 2: Planning, Project Identification, and Prioritization
- Phase 3: Engineering and Design
- Phase 4: Project Implementation
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management is accepting applications from eligible communities for no-cost technical assistance to complete Phases I and 2 of the Resilient Coastal Communities Program. The motion was made to complete an application to Resilient Coastal Communities Program by the deadline of April 25th, if it is at all possible.
Update –
The Board was asked to approve applying for grant funding through the Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP).
Timbo reported that Town staff, along with the Community Action Team and RCCP engineers, have identified five potential nature-based projects for consideration:
-
-
- Fire Station
- Pump Stations
- 300 Block
- East End
- Block Q
-
It was noted that eligible, approved nature-based projects may qualify for 100% grant funding. A motion was made to approve applying for the Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP) grant funding.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
8. Discussion and Possible Action on Lease Contract with Verizon – Finance Director McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 49 – 50
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible action on lease contract with Verizon Wireless.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Verizon has leased a spot on the water tower for a number of years and is wanting to renegotiate terms as the current lease is coming to an end.
After talking with the town manager we would like to propose that the rent go down to $3,800 per month with the same terms and escalation every five years. We are not interested in the buyout option at this time.
Update –
The Board reviewed Verizon’s current lease agreement. Daniel provided an overview of the lease and its current status, noting that Verizon currently pays approximately $3,800 per month. Verizon has previously requested to renegotiate the lease. In its most recent request, the company proposed extending the lease term while reducing the monthly payment. The Town’s policy has been not to entertain requests for lease rate reductions. After discussion, the Board tabled Verizon’s request and agreed to leave the existing lease terms unchanged, as the current agreement remains in effect through 2031.
No decision was made – No action taken
9. Discussion and Possible Approval of Ordinance 26-07, Ordinance Amending Ordinance 26-03, The Revenues and Appropriations Ordinance for Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027, Amendment No. 2 (Local Law Enforcement Officer Compensation Bonus Program) – Finance Director Daniel McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 51 – 52
Ordinance 26-07 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible action on budget amendment for SBI LEO bonus.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The SBI has distributed funds to municipalities for local law enforcement officers. This amendment is to be able to pay out the bonuses to our LEO’s.
Governor Stein Highlights Public Safety Investments in State Budget to Recruit and Retain Law Enforcement
Today Governor Josh Stein joined law enforcement officials and specialized units including the Selective Enforcement Unit and K-9 teams at Raleigh Police Department’s Special Operations Division to highlight the state budget’s investments in public safety, including the largest pay raises to law enforcement in recent state history. “Law enforcement careers are demanding and sometimes dangerous, but they are so important and rewarding,” said Governor Josh Stein. “We must do everything in our power to support those who keep North Carolinians safe. With this state budget, we are sending a clear message that we value our law enforcement officers and are investing in the next generation of North Carolinians who choose a career to keep people safe.” “I am sincerely grateful to Governor Stein and his team for their continued support of law enforcement across our state,” said Raleigh Police Chief Rico Boyce. “Including local law enforcement in Senate Bill 257 is a meaningful investment in the men and women who serve our communities every day. We are thankful for this support and for the Governor’s commitment to strengthening public safety throughout North Carolina.” At the event, Governor Stein also highlighted needed investments to support residents’ mental and behavioral health, including Raleigh Police Department’s Addressing Crises through Outreach, Referral, Networking, and Service (ACORNS) unit. Through ACORNS, teams pair police officers with mental health or social work professionals to respond to situations involving mental health, substance abuse, and homelessness. This co-responder model provides better service to people in need and frees up law enforcement to fight crime. Earlier this month, Governor Stein signed into law North Carolina’s first full state budget in more than two years, providing historic salary increases for state public safety officers. The budget includes a 16.2% pay raise for State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) and Alcohol Law Enforcement (ALE) officers, a 15% pay raise for State Highway Patrol officers, a 13% pay raise for correctional officers, and a 6.5% pay raise for probation and parole officers. It also sets aside nearly $40 million to provide sworn local law enforcement officers with a one-time $1,750 bonus.
Read more » click here
Update –
North Carolina’s state budget, signed by Governor Josh Stein, provides sworn local law enforcement officers (LEOs) with a one-time $1,750 bonus. The SBI distributed the funding to municipalities through the Local Law Enforcement Compensation Bonus Program. The Town received $18,839 and needs a budget amendment to distribute it. A motion was made to approve distribution of the funds.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
10. Discussion and Possible Approval of Ordinance 26-08, Ordinance Amending Ordinance 26- 03, The Revenues and Appropriations Ordinance for Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027, Amendment No. 3 (Closeout of the Lift Station Capital Project Fund) – Finance Director McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 53 – 54
Ordinance 26-08 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible action on budget amendment for fund 35 closeout.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
This amendment is necessary to close out fund 35. The project was completed last fiscal year and the fund is no longer necessary.
Update –
The project was completed last fiscal year and the fund is no longer necessary. The amendment was necessary in order to close out the Lift Station Capital Project Fund. This is simply a housekeeping item. A motion was made to approve transferring $19,589.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
11. Town Manager Report – Town Manager Chadwick
Town Manager Report » click here
Bryan reviewed the Town Manager Report
Ocean Boulevard Stormwater
Attempting to process project under CATEX
Editor’s note –
Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) is a category of actions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. It is the lowest level of NEPA environmental review, meaning projects qualifying for a CATEX do not require a full Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS
Previously reported – September 2026
Surveying, preliminary design, and hydraulic modeling have been completed
Previously reported – August 2026
The stormwater project is underway in coordination with NCDOT
Project drawings are not yet available
Previously reported – June 2025
The Town was awarded $2.2M in Environmental Infrastructure Disaster Relief Funding for stormwater projects. To get started USACE requires the execution of the Project Partnership Agreement. The Town portion of the 2.2 million dollar project is 25%, which would cost us $550,000. The motion was made to approve the project partnership agreement with the USACE and have the town staff execute the paperwork.
Block Q Master Plan
McGill will make presentation at the BOC’s November meeting
Previously reported – September 2026
Refining options based on meetings that were held recently
Previously reported – August 2026
Block Q stakeholder meetings have been completed. The BOC’s work session and Parks and Recreation Board input meetings have been scheduled.
Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP)
Staff attended the workshop held on September 24th
Grant information is an agenda item earlier at this meeting
Canal Dredging
This is an agenda item earlier at this meeting
Pier Property Site
This is an agenda item earlier at this meeting
Inlet Hazard Area
Previously reported – August 2026
Staff will be attending the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) meeting on August 26th and proposed changes to the Inlet Hazard Areas is on the agenda
Hot Button Items / Inlet Hazard Areas
For more information » click here
Central Reach Project – Brunswick County Reimbursement
The Town received the refund for the loan
This will be on the agenda at the BOC’s November meeting
Editor’s note –
The Interlocal Agreement with Brunswick County held $1,461,600 of Holden Beach funds for surety on the Special Obligation Bond
Brunswick County Biosolids Upgrade Project
The funds have been delivered to the County
Awarded contract cost less than anticipated
Previously reported – March 2026
Representatives from Brunswick County attended the meeting to present details about the proposed project. John Nichols, Director of Public Utilities for Brunswick County, outlined the County’s upcoming Biosolids Project, which carries a total projected cost of $37,000,000. As a wholesale customer of the County’s sewer system, the Town is now faced with the decision of which of the two available funding options to pursue. Although the Town currently maintains an agreement with the County, this agreement does not address the specific expansion component under consideration.
FY 26 Audit
Finance Officer Daniel McRainey made the report
Audit Committee meeting is scheduled for November 16th
There were two findings on the audit
We are waiting on a federal government report to finalize the audit
Police Department Personnel Update
Police Chief Steve Barger made the report. He discussed the part-time officer program.
They filled all four positions and the officers were good to go for tourist season. Having part-time officers made a big difference and it has been very beneficial to the department.
Hours worked by part-time officers reduced overtime cost, improved morale, and saved money. Overall he felt it was successful and program will continue next year.
Steve discussed the Detective position, her role and responsibilities
Josh Phillips was hired as an officer of the department
Fire Station
Previously reported – September 2026
RFQ is being finalized by staff
Previously reported – August 2026
The Town is preparing an Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for engineering and design services for the new fire station
Editor’s note –
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is a document that asks potential suppliers or vendors to detail their background and experience providing a specific good or service. In this case, the buyer is only concerned about the vendor’s skills and experience. Professionals responding will be selected solely based on their qualifications and not on price. Once a firm is selected the Town will negotiate a contract for the desired services. Therefore, the response is not a bid.
Previously reported – July 2025
The Planning Department is working on plans for a new fire station. Director Tim Evans talked to the State Fire Marshal and confirmed that the proposed fire station is the appropriate size, is in the appropriate location, and has the right staffing for a community of our size.
Previously reported – August 2025
Timbo gave a slide presentation that reviewed the justifications and requirements for a new fire station on the island at an estimated total cost of $3,375,000. He recommended that we should put the fire station project into the Capital Improvement Plan which will improve our Community Rating System. The improved Community Rating System ratings could get us additional savings on our insurance premium rates. The motion was made to put the fire station project into the Capital Improvement Plan as an unfunded requirement.
Fire Station Presentation » click here
Crosswalks
Previously reported – August 2026
The Town is working on crosswalk enhancements and the addition of new crosswalks at other locations. Funding is now available at no cost to the Town.
Editor’s note –
-
- Town has been working with the NCDOT evaluating the situation
- Several years ago five crosswalks were approved at four locations with two at Jordan Boulevard
- The locations were determined by working with NCDOT on meeting their nine criteria
- The Town, based on community feedback, would like substantially more
- We currently have twenty-four public beach access points that should have crosswalks
- NCDOT indicated that any painting of crosswalks by the Town is considered unauthorized and illegal
Beach Access Points
Staff are working on identifying emergency access points on the west end of the island
Currently the farthest west emergency access is at the 800 block
Beach Mats
Planning & Inspection Director Tim Evans made the report
CAMA now allows Mobi-mats. They have been getting requests from homeowners to install the mats for private beach access instead of a typical wooden walkway. The Planning & Zoning Board will need to make text amendments in order for us to allow the mats. He requested that the BOC’s direct him to move forward with making the necessary changes.
Previously reported – September 2022
Request for staff opinion on moving forward with planning for dry sand placement of mats at select THB public accesses to enhance handicap access to the beach based on information in the CRC-22-17 document (provided as background). Request for staff opinion to allow residential use of mats for beach walkways, including consideration as a potential solution to debris concerns arising from construction of long wooden walkways over multiple dunes.
Memo from North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Last year, the Commission amended the rules that established specific use standards for structural pedestrian accessways (dune crossovers) that allow for public access to the beach. You will recall that the use standards previously limited these accessways to elevated, piled-supported structures terminating on the beach near the seaward toe of the frontal dune. Due to numerous local governments expressing interest in using synthetic or wooden roll-out matting as a handicap-accessible alternative for beach access, the accessway rules were amended to allow the use of these types of mats for public beach access. However, the use these materials was limited to State, federal or local governments due to concerns expressed by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NC WRC) and the U.S . Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) about potential adverse impacts on sea turtle habitat resulting from their use waterward of the frontal dune. Since the amendments went into effect, Staff has had further discussion regarding the use of beach matting for residential applications as an alternative to structural accessways. As you are aware, during storms, dune crossovers (including stairways) can account for a great deal of the debris that wind up scattered across beaches and in waterways. Staff believes that by limiting matting to the same general standards that apply to structural accessways (six feet wide and no farther waterward than six feet from the toe of the dune), public access and wildlife protection goals will be met while reducing debris on the state’s beach during storm events. Residential application of matting material would adhere to the same standards previously approved including installation at grade and prohibiting extension onto the public trust beach. In addition, in recent years the Commission has approved three petitions for variances from local governments (Carolina Beach, Topsail Beach and Kure Beach) seeking to install beach mats on the dry sand beach (seaward of the frontal or primary dune and vegetation line) in support of enhanced handicap accessibility. The Division and Commission have supported both variance petitions, and in both cases, efforts were taken to minimize risks to sea turtles, including changes in siteing, size, and orientation of the proposed structures. However, following the Commission’s variance and issuance of a CAMA Minor Permit to the Town for installation of beach mats, the Town still assumes some liability for any “takes” of threatened or endangered species under the federal Endangered Species Act. For this reason, DCM has advised the Towns to consult directly with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to resolve this situation, potentially through the development of “Habitat Conservation Plans” or other formal approvals that can be issued by the USFWS for non-federal entities in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Staff are proposing a change to 07H.0308(c)(2)(C) to potentially allow beach mats on the dry sand beach without the need for a variance from the Commission, where they are sponsored by a local government for the purpose of enhanced handicap accessibility and are subject to review by the NC WRC and USFWS. The proposed amendments to 07K .0207 would also add residential use of matting material to the exemption language for beach accessways.
Mobi-Mat » click here
Coastal Resources Commission expands exemptions for beach mats
The NC Coastal Resources Commission approved new guidelines on Thursday that allows beach mats to be used in more ways. In a memo from the NC Department of Environmental Quality, staff says towns like Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and Topsail Beach have petitioned to install the mats closer to the water. Additionally, staff says they’ve also had several requests from oceanfront homeowners to install the mats for private beach access instead of a typical wooden walkway. The commission approved an amendment at its meeting in Wilmington on Thursday allowing mats sponsored by local governments to be installed on dry sand without a variance from the commission. The amendment also allows the residential use of the matting for beach walkways.
Read more » click here
The NC Coastal Resources Commission approved new guidelines that allows beach mats to be used in more ways. Public Comments speaker pointed out that accessibility is a need not a want. Discussion to allow dry sand placement of mats at some public beach accesses for handicap use and possibly for residential walkways too. Commissioner Kwiatkowski would like to see this done for next season. The motion made was to have staff make recommendation where mats can be utilized.
Previously reported – December 2022
Timbo made a presentation that considers both regulations and policies that needs to be considered in order to develop a plan. Staff made recommendations where mats could be utilized. Let’s just say that it’s a work in progress for now.

Strategic Planning
Previously reported – September 2026
The Strategic Planning session is scheduled to be held on December 4th
In Case You Missed It
Brunswick County Rescinds Stage One Water Conservation
PUBLIC NOTICE
Brunswick County Public Utilities is rescinding its Stage 1 Voluntary Water Conservation Alert effective Friday, Oct. 16, 2026. This notice does not apply to properties that use water sources outside of the County’s public water system (i.e., private groundwater wells, retention ponds, and Brunswick Regional – H2GO). H2GO customers should check their website for information about any water conservation or best practices they may have issued for their customers: https://www.h2gonc.gov/. This conservation alert was originally issued Aug. 31, 2026. Recent rainfall, improving drought conditions, and the public’s efforts to use water wisely have helped even out demands for water from Brunswick County’s available production and distribution capacity. Brunswick County appreciates the efforts our water customers took to follow our mandatory and voluntary water restrictions while Extreme Drought (D3) and Exceptional Drought (D4) conditions affected our county this summer.
THB Police Newsletter (10/15/26)
Reminders
October brings cooler weather, the Festival by the Sea, and more fall activities to Holden Beach. HBPD reminds everyone to keep safety in mind.
Festival by the Sea
Expect increased vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Slow down, stay alert, and follow directions from officers and event personnel.
Lock it Up
Lock vehicles, remove keys and valuables, and secure bicycles, golf carts, garages, and outdoor property. Don’t provide an easy opportunity for crime.
Leaving for the Season?
Secure doors, windows, and outdoor items. Consider having someone periodically check your property.
Halloween
Drivers, watch for pedestrians and slow down. Parents and children, stay visible and use extra caution around roadways.
Holden Beach Police Department
Community • Safety • Service
The seasons may change, but our commitment to Holden Beach does not.
If you see us out on patrol, stop and say hello!
Stay safe and enjoy October at Holden Beach!
THB Newsletter (09/17/26)
Press Release from Chief Barger
HB Police Department Requests Public Assistance Following Vehicle Break-Ins
The Holden Beach Police Department is investigating multiple vehicle break-ins that occurred during the overnight hours of September 16-17, 2026. Officers responded to several reports of vehicles being unlawfully entered in various areas of Holden Beach. Investigators are actively working to identify those responsible and determine whether additional incidents may have occurred that have not yet been reported. The Holden Beach Police Department is requesting the public’s assistance. Residents and visitors are asked to review any home security, doorbell, or surveillance camera footage that may have captured suspicious persons or vehicles during the overnight hours. Any footage showing suspicious activity may be valuable to the investigation. Additionally, anyone who discovers that their vehicle, residence, storage area, or other property was unlawfully entered, or that items are missing, is urged to report the incident by calling 911. As a reminder, residents and visitors are encouraged to take simple precautions to reduce the risk of becoming a victim of crime. Please ensure that vehicle doors, residential doors, and storage areas are locked, and avoid leaving valuables in plain view inside vehicles. The Holden Beach Police Department would also like to thank the Shallotte Police Department for its assistance in this active investigation.
THB Newsletter (08/31/26)
Brunswick County Public Utilities Annual Change from Chloramines to Chlorine
PUBLIC NOTICE
Every year, Brunswick County Public Utilities and the towns, cities, and other utilities that purchase water from Brunswick County, implement an annual flushing program. Public Utilities employees flush the water mains by opening fire hydrants and allowing them to flow freely for a short period of time. The flushing cleans out sediment and allows routine maintenance of the more than 1,440 miles of water lines and over 8,161 fire hydrants in the Brunswick County service area. Flushing may result in discoloration and presence of sediment in your water. These conditions are not harmful and are temporary.
During the annual flushing program, a slight change is made in the water treatment process to facilitate an effective flushing program. Throughout the year, Brunswick County Public Utilities adds combined chlorine (in the form of chloramines), to the water as the primary disinfectant. During the annual flushing program, chlorine is added in an uncombined state, commonly referred to as free chlorine. Free chlorine is more effective than combined chlorine at reacting with sediments suspended during flushing. This common practice is also used as preventive maintenance to kill bacteria that, though harmless when consumed by humans, can introduce unwanted taste and odor, and create issues with maintaining a disinfectant residual.
Brunswick County will use free chlorine as the primary disinfectant
from October 1, 2026 through November 2026.
Depending on your location within the distribution system and usage patterns, it could take 7 to 10 days for your drinking water to transition from combined chlorine to free chlorine at the beginning of the flushing program. The annual change from chloramines to free chlorine for this brief period is required by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality to promote optimal disinfection throughout the water distribution system.
You may experience a change in the taste or smell of your drinking water while free chlorine is being used as the primary disinfection agent. If you are especially sensitive to the taste and odor of chlorine, try keeping an open container of drinking water in your refrigerator. This will enable the chlorine to dissipate and reduce the taste of chlorine in your water. Remember – drinking water has a shelf life. Change out the water in your refrigerated container weekly.
Note:
If you have an aquarium or pond, always test the water that you add to your aquatic environment to be sure it is free of any chlorine before adding fish or other animals. Chemical additives with directions for removing either free chlorine or chloramines from water for use in fish tanks or ponds are available at pet/fish supply stores. Kidney dialysis clinics and customers on home kidney dialysis equipment should also be aware of this change.
National Flood Insurance Program: Reauthorization
Congress must periodically renew the NFIP’s statutory authority to operate. On September 30, 2026, the president signed legislation passed by Congress that extends the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP’s) authorization to December 11, 2026.
News from Town of Holden Beach
The town sends out emails of events, news, agendas, notifications and emergency information. If you would like to be added to their mailing list, please go to their web site to complete your subscription to the Holden Beach E-Newsletter.
For more information » click here
What He Did Not Say –
Public Service Announcement
Hunting season runs from October till the end of January
Hunting is prohibited within Town limits
Please notify the Police Department if you hear shots being fired
§130.01 DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS.
It shall be unlawful for a person to shoot or project any stone, rock, shot, or other hard substance by means of a slingshot, bean shooter, air rifle, popgun, bow, or other similar contrivance, or to fire any pistol, gun, or other firearms within the town except on archery ranges, firing ranges, or in legally-established shooting galleries or ranges, or in the discharge of duty by law enforcement officers, provided that the use of firearms in the destruction of rodents, pigeons, squirrels, or similar animals or birds or reptiles that are considered to be a menace to public health or property may be permitted by special permission of the Chief of Police.
§130.02 HUNTING PROHIBITED.
It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to do any hunting of wildlife with dogs or without dogs within the town limits.
Remind everyone it’s Hurricane Season – be prepared, have a plan!
If you know something, hear something, or see something –
call 911 and let the police deal with it.
Low Speed Vehicle Safety » click here
Public Service Announcement regarding low speed vehicle safety.
Police Chief encourages everyone to download the app
NC Police Connect on the AppStore
Upcoming Events
Contractors Information Seminar / November 5th
Veterans Appreciation Luncheon / Friday, November 6th
SBI Three Bridge Tour / Saturday, November 7th
Turkey Trot / Thursday, November 26th
Tree Lighting / Thursday, December 3rd
12. Public Comments on General Items
Block Q Restrooms
.
In March 2024, the town accepted a $560,000 state grant and committed $140,000 toward Block Q restrooms, parking, site preparation, and landscaping. Work began in April 2025. Following a project timeline extension, the facility opened in May 2026. Five months later, the new public restroom facility still lacks clear signage identifying the building or directing visitors to the restrooms. Although the parking sign notes that short-term free parking is available for restroom users, there appears to be no other indication of the building’s purpose. Without visible signage, it is unclear how the public would know if the restrooms are available. Anecdotally, this appears to be reflected in current use patterns, as most activity still seems centered around the old bathrooms. At a minimum, I recommend placing a sign on each side of the building. It may also be prudent to add directional signs along Jordan Boulevard to guide visitors to the facility. Given the significant investment in these restrooms, they should not remain underutilized simply because the public is unaware they are there.
13. Closed Session Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a)(3), To Consider the Qualifications, Competence, Performance of a Public Officer or Employee and North Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a)(3), To Consult with the Attorney
No decision was made – No action taken
General Comments
BOC’s Meeting
The Board of Commissioners’ next Regular Meeting is scheduled on the third Tuesday of the month, November 17th
Polling place moved
The Brunswick County Board of Elections announced that the polling place has been relocated to Sabbath Home Baptist Church, 990 Sabbath Home Road in Supply. Updated voter registration cards have been mailed to affected voters.
-
It’s not like they don’t have anything to work on …
The following five (5) items are what’s In the Works/Loose Ends queue:
-
-
-
- 2019 – Dog Park
- 2021 – Pier Properties Project
- 2021 – Rights-of-Way
- 2021 – Block Q Project/Carolina Avenue
- 2023 – Fire Station Project
-
-
The definition of loose ends is a fragment of unfinished business or a detail that is not yet settled or explained, which is the current status of these items. All of these items were started and then put on hold, and they were never put back in the queue. This Board needs to continue working on them and move these items to closure.
Know the difference between wants and needs?
One of the most basic concepts of economics is want vs. need.A need is something you have to have.
. • It’s something you can’t do without.
A want is something you would like to have.
. • It’s not absolutely necessary, but it would be a good thing to have. -
- Beach Nourishment Need
Fire Station Need
Water Tank Need/Want
Pier Want
Captain Pete’s PropertyWant
- .
We do not have sufficient resources to fund all of these projects. If we use the available funds for wants rather than needs, we will be unable to address our essential priorities. If additional funding is needed, a property tax increase will be required—plain and simple.
.
Lost in the Sauce
.
From 2025
Building Numbers
Previously reported – September 2025
§157.087 BUILDING NUMBERS.
(C) Structures abutting the Atlantic Intercoastal Waterway, canals, and any public trust waters shall have house number affixed to the back of the structure or on the end of the dock/pier visible so as in case an emergency and per the North Carolina Residential Code Section R319.1
Timbo explained that this is a safety issue. Any changes made to the Zoning Code Section 157 requires a Public Hearing. The motion was made to schedule a Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance change before the next BOC’s Regular Meeting on October 21st.
Previously reported – October 2025
Public Hearing was held at the beginning of the meeting as required. The proposed ordinance change requires property owners with homes on the waterways to display building numbers on the back of their homes. The motion was made to accept Consistency Statement and Ordinance 25-15 as submitted.
Ordinance 25-15 » click here
From 2024
Open Flame Devices
§91.17 OPEN FLAME DEVICES.
Charcoal burners and other open flame devices shall not be operated on or within ten feet of combustible construction. Exception: propane fueled grills.
Discussion was about ways of informing the public concerning the placement of open flame devices. They tossed around a couple of ideas and they felt that they could communicate most effectively through the property management companies. It was decided to have the staff contact the property management companies to get their input on ways to improve communications regarding Town ordinances.
Editor’s Note –
It is my understanding that Hobbs Realty addresses this issue by recommending, if they opt for charcoal, that each rental property have park grills fixed in place away from the structure. That seems like a pretty simple solution, albeit with a minor cost for each rental property. They also notify guests in arrival emails of pertinent ordinances like this one. I’m thinking those are ideas could be a benchmark for the other rental companies.
Previously reported – November 2024
Fire Prevention
Staff coordinated a meeting with the rental property companies. Representatives from three (3) of the major companies attended. Two (2) of the companies currently provide information regarding regulations concerning open flame devices. The third company does not allow charcoal grills and did not want to provide information on items they prohibit. The companies already have been working with their homeowners and renters to educate them on the rules and to come up with ways to encourage people from moving these devices under their homes. They were not receptive to the idea of the Town ordering magnets to help with education
THB Newsletter (10/24/24)
October is Fire Prevention Month, with a goal to raise fire safety awareness and help protect homes and families. According to the National Fire Protection Association, unattended cooking is the #1 cause of home fires and in America, fire departments respond to a fire every 23 seconds! We ask for your help with our efforts to protect the property and lives on Holden Beach. Remember, our Code of Ordinances prevents the use of charcoal burners and other open flame devices on or within 10 feet of any combustible construction.
-
Hurricane Season
For more information » click here.
Be prepared – have a plan!
No matter what a storm outlook is for a given year,
vigilance and preparedness is urged.
El Niño just gave us the first no-hurricane September in decades. How long can the Atlantic shutout last?
The Atlantic Ocean has failed to produce a hurricane in the month of September for the first time in more than 30 years, the latest feat by a super El Niño widely predicted to become the strongest ever. Only three other Septembers have gone hurricane-free in the Atlantic in records dating back to 1950. It last happened in 1994, and before that in 1972 and 1962, according to Dr. Phil Klotzbach, a hurricane expert with Colorado State University. Three tropical storms did form last month, so the Atlantic wasn’t completely closed for business. Of those, Tropical Storm Fay was closest to hurricane intensity. Its winds fell short by 4 mph, but there’s a chance Fay gets upgraded in the National Hurricane Center’s final review. The numbers have been stark. The average for a season is seven hurricanes, and we should have seen five of them by now. Last year was below average, with five hurricanes — but four had already shown up by the start of October, three of which came in September. September is usually prime time for hurricanes because storm-fueling warm water is at its most expansive and hottest alongside ripe atmospheric factors. About two to three hurricanes develop in the month on average. This El Niño-stifled season had already blown past the most reliable record for the longest wait for the first hurricane to materialize, and the lack of any as October begins sets the stage for an even rarer possibility: an entire Atlantic season without hurricanes.
El Niño’s thumbprint is all over the tropics
Water temperatures have been warm enough for Atlantic hurricanes, but El Niño-fueled wind shear, aka tropical-system kryptonite, is the biggest reason the season has been squashed. Wind shear refers to changes in wind speed and direction at different levels of the atmosphere, and it can shred apart anything from budding tropical systems to full-blown hurricanes. The shear has been record-strong since this summer across parts of the Atlantic’s so-called main development region, which extends from Africa through the Caribbean, according to Klotzbach. As the name suggests, this is where many storms get their start at the height of the season — mid-August to early October — but this year it’s been nearly shutdown. Tropical storms Dolly and Gonzalo are the only systems that have formed in this part of the ocean so far, and a wall of wind shear ripped both of them apart. Dolly lasted one day; Gonzalo almost made it two. Meanwhile, El Niño’s extremely warm water has turned hurricane season in the eastern and central Pacific hyperactive. A total of 20 named storms — including three Category 5 hurricanes — have roamed those ocean basins. Hurricane Polo’s extreme rapid intensification to a Category 5 with 180 mph winds off the coast of Mexico last week tied it as the third strongest eastern Pacific hurricane on record.
Year without a hurricane?
There have been just two years without an Atlantic hurricane: 1914 and 1907. But both come with an asterisk since they were before satellites and aircraft started tracking hurricanes more accurately, so one could have been missed. In more modern records — since 1950 — there hasn’t been a single Atlantic season without a hurricane. The 1982 and 2013 seasons saw the fewest, with just two. There are still two months to go, and October averages about one hurricane formation each year; occasionally November can spin one up, too. But the deeper we head into the month, the greater the odds the season could end without one. Late-season storms tend to form closer to the United States, including in the Gulf, Caribbean and off the Southeast coast, which gives them greater odds to impact land. The Caribbean is fully entrenched in El Niño’s shear, so it’s likely off the table as a development area the rest of the way. But as this year has shown, it doesn’t take a hurricane-strength system to cause significant impacts, particularly in a warming world that’s making tropical systems wetter. Tropical storms Arthur and Edouard didn’t last long, but heavy rain from both resulted in significant flash flooding and water rescues near the Gulf Coast.
Read more » click here
-
Do you enjoy this newsletter?
Then please forward it to a friend!
Lou’s Views . HBPOIN
. • Gather and disseminate information
. • Identify the issues and determine how they affect you
. • Act as a watchdog
. • Grass roots monthly newsletter since 2008




THB Police Newsletter












SBI Three Bridge Tour 


Brunswick County Rescinds Stage One Water Conservation
News from Town of Holden Beach 

















This tiny sticker on your car is a big waste of time and money
Ding! Ding! Ding! The long, strange fight over your car’s seat-belt chime.


















Brunswick County Agricultural Fair and Expo





Free Cleanup Week
North Carolina sets new tourism spending record in 2025
RANSOM