Lou’s Views
“Unofficial” Minutes & Comments
BOC’s Special Meeting 03/11/26
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet » click here
Audio Recording » click here
1. Budget Workshop
a. Fiscal Year 2025 – 2026 Goals and Objectives
Agenda Packet – pages 1 – 11
Common Themes for Objectives
-
-
- Block Q / Jordan Blvd.
- Parking
- Stormwater
- Pier Property
- Other Facilities / Capital Projects
-
Update –
Town Manager Bryan Chadwick reviewed the budget process and submitted a tentative meeting calendar.
2. Discussion and Possible Action on Defining the Scope for the Comprehensive Design Plan for the Jordan Boulevard/Block Q Area
Agenda Packet – pages 12 – 20
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible scope of work for Block Q/Jordan Boulevard master plan.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The BOC chose McGill for the architect/engineering services for the Block Q/Jordan Boulevard area master plan. The BOC should consider what they want in the master plan final product before a contract comes back before the board. The plan is to be used as a guide and items included in the solicitation discussed “assessing the area and develop a comprehensive plan to meet the current and future recreational needs” which include but are not limited to “stage/pavilion, dance floor, pickleball courts, boat parking and vehicle parking.”
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Board should decide what they want included in the final plan.
Town of Holden Beach Parks & Recreation
2021 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Markers and informational signage that promote the trails’ use for reaching fitness goals.
The Town should also consider connecting park facilities, residences, and popular destination spots with sidewalks, as needed.
A highly recommended goal for the Town to pursue is to create a small area plan to develop a linear park/multi-purpose path connecting the Holden Beach Town Hall, Bridgeview Park, the public restroom building, Jordan Boulevard Pavilion, boat ramp, Padgett Garden. This effort would create a safer more cohesive public space under and around the Holden Beach bridge and could become an attractive destination for residents and visitors. Existing efforts to link Padgett Garden with the public restroom building could be expanded as the first of a multi-phased approach to the project.
The Town should seek to develop a master plan exploring design options, materials, opinions of costs, and other due diligence required to complete this small area plan.
Previously reported – September 2025
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
There have been several proposals for the development of Block Q with amenities such as a band stand/pavilion, pickle ball courts, boat parking and vehicle parking. However, a comprehensive plan to develop not only block Q but the surrounding parcels (Jordan Blvd, former pavilion site, bridge area) is needed to make the most efficient use of the available properties to provide these amenities. Subsequent construction of these amenities could then be accomplished in phases according to priorities and budget availability. The intent is to allow a professional design firm to bring their expertise and creativity to bear in developing the master plan, considering all the property available. The BOC should provide some initial guide lines for the RFQ but shall not constrain the firm to those guidelines in developing the master plans.
They want to develop a comprehensive plan not only for block Q but also the surrounding parcels. The Board is trying to approach the development by keeping the end in mind. The plan is to only provide the vendor with guidelines of what they would like to see there. The motion was made to instruct staff to develop an RFQ for a comprehensive design for Block Q, Jordan Blvd, bridge area, and the site of the former pavilion to be reviewed by the BOC.
Previously reported – October 2025
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
At the September BOC meeting, the board directed staff to bring back an RFQ for a master plan for Block Q, Jordan Boulevard, the bridge area and the site of the former pavilion.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The purpose of the RFQ is to solicit professional design firms that can bring their expertise regarding all the property available. The following document is attached for your consideration and further direction.
Editor’s note –
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is a document that asks potential suppliers or vendors to detail their background and experience providing a specific good or service. In this case, the buyer is only concerned about the vendor’s skills and experience. Professionals responding will be selected solely based on their qualifications and not on price. Once a firm is selected the Town will negotiate a contract for the desired services. Therefore, the response is not a bid.
Christy presented the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) document a comprehensive design plan for Block Q, Jordan Boulevard, the bridge area, and the site of the former pavilion for their consideration. Commissioner Paarfus was not ready to support this document as written. The vote to approve the RFQ failed. Mayor Holden attempted to do an end run by proposing that they bring back the previous plans so that they can move forward with a concert venue. After considerable discussion that mostly revolved around protocols the Town Manager intervened. The staff will incorporate comments from the commissioners regarding the RFQ. They will also look at moving forward with the original concert venue plan separately as another option. Staff will have something prepared for them by the next regular BOC’s meeting.
No decision was made – No action taken
Previously reported – December 2025
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible action on stage and RFQ.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Staff promised to bring back two items, one being a recommendation on how to move forward with the stage and the other being the RFQ for the master plan of the Jordan Boulevard/Block Q area.
a. With board approval, staff will move forward with seeking a design and drafting specifications to attempt to complete construction this budget year
b. The original RFQ presented in October is also attached for your consideration
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend board approve a path forward to complete these projects.
The Board approved having the staff move forward with seeking a design and drafting specifications for a stage in the Block Q area. His intent is to present plans to the Board with more than one recommendation for the stage area. Staff will also send out a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a comprehensive plan for the Block Q/Jordan Boulevard area.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Previously reported – February 2026
Discussion and Possible Selection of Firm to Provide a Comprehensive Design Plan for Jordan Boulevard/Block Q Area – Town Manager Chadwick & Assistant Town Manager Ferguson
McGill Block Q Jordan » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible action on RFQs for Block Q/Jordan Boulevard master plan.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town issued a RFQ for architect/engineering services for the Block Q/Jordan Boulevard area master plan. Three submissions were received: McGill, HDR, and Pinnacle. Respondents were ranked using the nine criteria outlined in the RFQ (attached). McGill received the most points beating HOR by a score of 455 to 450. The BOC should consider what they want in the master plan final product before a contract comes back before the board.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Board should decide what they want included in the final plan and which firm to complete the product.
There was discussion on the selection of a firm for a comprehensive design plan for the Jordan Blvd/Block Q Master Plan. Three (3) vendors were scored based on nine (9) criteria. HDR and McGill scores were very close. They chose to select McGill and awarded the contract tonight. A motion was made to accept the RFQ from McGill. They will have the planning department and staff work with the board to narrow the scope of the project.
A decision was made – Approved (3-1)
Commissioner Myers opposed the motion
Update –
Town Manager Bryan Chadwick led the discussion. The BOC’s were expected to consider what they want included in the final master plan before a contract returns to the board for approval. However, much of the discussion repeated points that had already been raised previously. The original plan had been to provide the vendor only with general guidelines outlining what the board would like to see included. Bryan attempted to get some direction from the board but received very little input. As a result, it was unclear what—if anything—was ultimately decided. It appeared the board effectively abdicated responsibility to McGill to determine the plan.
The need is for a cohesive and comprehensive plan that incorporates all of the properties. Ideally, the board should approach development with the end goal in mind. Hopefully, the resulting plan will address not only Block Q but also the surrounding parcels, creating a comprehensive vision for the entire area.
It seems we must accept what this situation reflects:
a near-total lack of planning or foresight.
3. Discussion and Possible Action on Legal Services
. a. Acceptance of Attorney Moore’s Resignation
. b. Issuance of Request for Proposals
Agenda Packet – page 21
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Legal Services
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Attorney Moore submitted her resignation effective May 1st. In order to solicit new legal counsel, the Board would need to accept the resignation and determine the process for selection of the new attorney/firm. Staff recommends the Board direct staff to issue a Request for Proposals for Legal Services unless a different method is preferred to move forward.
Update –
The Board accepted attorney Moore’s resignation
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
A second motion was made to issue a Request for Proposals for Legal Services in order to start the replacement process
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
4. Closed Session Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 1 43–318.11(a)( 3), To Consider the Qualifications, Competence, Performance of a Public Officer or Employee and North Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a)(1), To Prevent the Disclosure of Privileged Information
No decision was made – No action taken
General Comments –
Commissioner Myers was not in attendance
BOC’s Regular Meeting 03/17/26
Board of Commissioners’ Agenda Packet » click here
Audio Recording » click here
1. Consent Agenda Items
a) Police Report
Agenda Packet – pages 9 – 14
Police Report » click here
b) Inspections Department Report
Agenda Packet – pages 15 – 18
Inspections Report » click here
c) Finance Department Report
Agenda Packet – pages 19 – 24
Finance Report » click here
d) Public Works Department Report
Agenda Packet – pages 25 – 26
Public Works Report » click here
2. Presentation by Brunswick County for Upcoming Biosolids Project – Public Works Director Benton
Agenda Packet – pages 27 – 29
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation by Brunswick County for upcoming biosolids project.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Holden Beach is a Partner with Brunswick County’s West Regional Sewer plant. They are planning a biosolids project to improve the capacity of the plant. They are going to present us with two options and discuss the benefit of each one.
Biosolids Project-Capital Cost Participation Summary
Total Project Cost: $37,000,000
Participant Funding Election
-
-
- Upfront Capital Contribution
Participant pays its allocated capital share at project initiation ($3,083,333).
- Upfront Capital Contribution
-
-
-
- Rate-Funded (Differential Rate)
County funds capital costs upfront; participant repays its share through the biosolids rate of $1.96 per 1,000 gallons ($154,902 annually).
- Rate-Funded (Differential Rate)
-
Editor’s Note –
Biosolids are nutrient-rich organic materials derived from treated sewage sludge, primarily used as fertilizer or soil conditioner in agriculture to improve soil fertility and structure. Produced through wastewater treatment processes like separation, stabilization, and drying, they serve as a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers. While offering significant benefits like soil conditioning, they pose environmental risks such as contaminating soil/water with PFAS, heavy metals, and pathogens.
Update –
Representatives from Brunswick County attended the meeting to present details about the proposed project. John Nichols, Director of Public Utilities for Brunswick County, outlined the County’s upcoming Biosolids Project, which carries a total projected cost of $37,000,000. As a wholesale customer of the County’s sewer system, the Town is now faced with the decision of which of the two available funding options to pursue. Although the Town currently maintains an agreement with the County, this agreement does not address the specific expansion component under consideration. Mayor Holden arrived thoroughly prepared and raised several pertinent questions seeking clarification on issues that could directly affect Holden Beach. The discussion on this agenda item lasted nearly an hour.
No decision was made – No action taken
3. Discussion and Possible Action on Ordinance 26-02, An Ordinance Amending Holden Beach Code of Ordinances Section 30.15 Voting and Quorums – Town Clerk Finnell
Agenda Packet – pages 30 – 32
Ordinance 26-02 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Ordinance 26-02, An Ordinance Amending Holden Beach Code of Ordinances Section 30.15 Voting and Quorums
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Section 30.15 Voting and Quorums of the Code of Ordinances is inconsistent with the Rules of Procedure the Board approved in December. Members of the Board have expressed interest in amending the code to reflect the language approved in the rules. Amending the code would also make the Town’s definition of quorum be consistent with NCGS l 60A-74. If the Board would like to update the definition of quorum in the Code of Ordinances, the suggested motion is approve Ordinance 26-02.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Amend the code to be consistent with NCGS 160A-74 and the Rules of Procedure.
Previously reported – December 2025
Commissioner Pate asked about the quorum definition since Attachment 2 matches the state statute, not the Town ordinance. Town Clerk Finnell explained if Attachment 2 is adopted, the quorum would need to be changed to match the Town’s Code of Ordinances.
Update –
The Board considered amending the Town’s Code of Ordinances to align the definition of a quorum with North Carolina General Statute 160A-74 and the Town’s Rules of Procedure. During the discussion, Board members raised questions about the proper procedure for making this amendment. Consequently, the Board decided to revisit the item at the next meeting, during which a Public Hearing will also be scheduled. The Board further discussed the importance of revising the quorum definition to ensure consistency across all governing documents. Staff will provide additional information and recommendations at the April meeting to support the continuation of this process.
No decision was made – No action taken
4. Discussion and Possible Approval of the Town of Holden Beach ADA Assessment – Inspections Director Evans
Agenda Packet – page 33, plus separate packet
ADA Assessment » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of the Town of Holden Beach’s ADA Assessment
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The town conducted its own ADA assessment with the intentions of fulfilling the Title II requirements. Approval will allow for budgeting and executing those items listed. This completes one of last year’s goals.
Previously reported – February 2025
Small Town ADA Assessment » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action – Small Town ADA Assessment
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
ADA compliance is a federal requirement under the American with Disabilities Act. Often, ADA compliance can be overlooked when considering activities, maintenance, and changing guidelines such as the ABA requirements for certain activities and locations. The town has indicated a desire to make the activities and structures located within the Town as accessible as possible and practical and to ensure compliance with the ADA guidelines.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Receive outline and timeline and provide feedback as necessary to staff.
The Americans with Disabilities Act gives civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities like those provided to individuals because of race, color, sex, national origin, age, and religion. It guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in employment, transportation, State and local government services, telecommunications, and in the goods and services provided by businesses.
-
-
- Existing Facilities: Program Accessibility
- New Construction, Alterations, and Additions
- Maintenance and Accessible Features
- Effective Communications,
- Process for complying with ADA
-
Director Evans presented the ADA Assessment plan. He stated that they started the evaluation when we entered into the Key Bridge Mediation Agreement. The town has indicated a desire to make the activities and structures located within the Town as accessible as possible and practical and to ensure compliance with the ADA guidelines. The goal is to identify areas where we don’t meet state or federal requirements, plus any opportunities for improvement. The Town has spent more than $750,000 so far and when projects are completed it will have exceeded what was required.
Previously reported – October 2025
ADA Assessment Report » click here
Executive Summary
This comprehensive report assesses the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance of key public facilities in the Town of Holden Beach, North Carolina, as of October 1, 2025. The evaluation covers nineteen (19) physical locations, including parking areas, walkways, restrooms, parks, and municipal buildings, alongside a digital accessibility review of the town’s website (hbtownhall.com). Assessments are based on ADA standards for physical elements (e.g., signage, access routes, slopes, landings, handrails, fixtures) and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA for digital accessibility.
Key findings indicate that most physical facilities are fully or partially compliant, requiring minor maintenance (e.g., repainting, signage adjustments, walkway sealing) or limited construction (e.g., concrete pads at Sailfish Park). Digital accessibility needs enhancements to support assistive technologies. Budget allocations, including $500,00 for ADA projects in FY 2024-2025 (required by Mediation Agreement), $180,00 for existing projects. A proposed FY 2025-2026 budget maintaining tax rates, support these efforts. Total estimated costs for physical fixes range from $500,000 to $1M over 2-3 years, with digital upgrades at $5,000-$20,000 initially and $1,000-$5,000 annually. Three future sites are identified for assessment. Prioritizing these recommendations will ensure equitable access, mitigate legal risks {e.g., lawsuits averaging $10,000-$50,000 per case). and align with Holden Beach’s tourism-driven economy.
Overall Recommendations and Prioritization
-
- Physical: Address Sailfish Park (concrete pad, routes) and construction sites (103.5 QBE, Block Q). Maintain annually to counter coastal
- Digital: Audit com, implement fixes (alt text, contrast, navigation), and train staff.
- Coastal Challenges: Use corrosion-resistant materials, clear sand regularly, and coordinate with NC DEQ for environmental
- Funding: Leverage SPART funds ($334,000), pursue NC DEQ grants ($2.25M statewide in 2025).
- Community: Engage via public hearings (e.g., October 21, 2025) and
- Future: Assess new sites (357.5 OBW Walkway, 1017 OBW Walkway, 1191 OBW – New Walkway at West End Gate). And all improvements to existing non-compliant walkways.
- Update: Perform annual ADA assessment for the Town of Holden Beach, for budget analysis and
Timbo developed a Small Town ADA Assessment which he described as a good start. We still don’t meet all of the ADA guideline requirements yet. Motion was made to accept the assessment, which will be posted to the Town’s website for public review.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Update –
Timbo provided a brief update on the current status, noting that all issues have been addressed and that the Town has gone above and beyond the requirements outlined in the mediation agreement. The Holden Beach ADA Assessment was briefly discussed and subsequently approved. Approval of the assessment establishes a proactive plan, enabling the Town to effectively budget for and implement the identified improvements.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
5. Discussion and Possible Approval of the Hazard Mitigation Plan – Inspections Director Evans
. a. Resolution 26-03, Resolution Adopting the Southeastern North Carolina Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Agenda Packet – pages 34 – 37
Resolution 26-03 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
The Town of Holden Beach Commissioners need to approve the Resolution to adopt the Southeastern Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Southeastern Hazard Mitigation Plan is a vital part of the assistance and recovery for storms. The adoption is required for many reimbursements as well as grant acquisition. The current plan expires in April of this year. A lapse in the plan could affect future funding and will have a direct effect on the town’s 20 percent insurance reduction rate.
Previously reported – February 2021
Southeastern NC Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan
This is an update to our regional Hazard Mitigation plan. This plan allows the town to be part of the required regional plan while maintaining autonomy within.
Staff has been involved with the process since the beginning of the update in July 2019. Some portions of the updates are mandatory on an associated regional basis. The only significant changes are those associated with our commitment to a stricter NFIP and the resiliency improvements to the town’s sewer lift station upfits.
FEMA requires that hazard mitigation plans be updated every five years to remain eligible for federal mitigation and public assistance funding. To prepare the 2021 Southeastern NC Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan, ESP Associates. Inc. was hired by North Carolina Emergency Management to provide professional mitigation planning services for the plan update. Per the contractual scope of work, the consultant team followed the mitigation planning process recommended by FEMA (Publication Series 386 and Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide) and recommendations provided by North Carolina Emergency Management (NCEM) mitigation planning staff. Additionally, for the update, FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) and Community Wildfire Protection Plan requirements were integrated into the plan update.
FEMA definition of Hazard Mitigation – Any sustained action taken
to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards.
Update –
Federal Emergency Management Agency requires hazard mitigation plans to be updated every five years in order to maintain eligibility for federal mitigation and public assistance funding. The Southeastern North Carolina Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan plays a vital role in storm recovery and post-disaster assistance, helping ensure communities are better prepared for future events. It establishes a framework for coordinated response efforts and supports long-term resilience planning. Adoption of the plan is essential for securing reimbursements and qualifying for grant funding opportunities; without it, many financial resources would not be available to the Town. The current plan is set to expire in April of this year, making timely renewal critical to avoid any disruption in eligibility. A lapse in the plan could jeopardize future funding and negatively impact the Town’s 20% insurance premium reduction. To maintain access to these financial and insurance benefits, the Board adopted the Southeastern North Carolina Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
6. Discussion and Possible Action on Proposals for Audit Services – Finance Director McRainey
Agenda Packet – pages 38 – 46, plus separate packet
BRC Audit Proposal » click here
Martin Starnes Audit Proposal » click here
Thompson Price Audit Proposal » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
The governing body select an auditor for the next 3 fiscal years.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Every three years we send out RFPs for audit services and the town staff has scored the three responses.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Audit committee was not able to schedule a meeting with a required quorum prior to agenda approval.
FINANCE RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Martin, Starnes, & Associates based off our scoring which had M,S&A at 283/300 points and Thompson, Price, Adams & Associates in second at 262/300 points.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Approve selecting Martin, Starnes, & Associates for audit services.
Previously reported – March 2025
ISSUE/ ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible action to approve audit contract with Martin Starnes & Associates.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
This contract is for an independent auditor to perform the audit for fiscal year 2025.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Audit committee met and recommended approval of contract at previous meeting before new members were elected and will meet before the board meeting to discuss with new members.
Audit committee met and recommended approval of the contract. There was no discussion, the motion was to approve the contract for audit services between the Town and Martin Starnes and Associates for $50,430. The fee schedule has increased by 219% since the first contract in 2020.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Update –
Commissioner Myers questioned the selection process, noting that the Audit Committee typically conducts the scoring rather than staff. However, the Audit Committee was unable to meet prior to agenda approval due to the lack of a quorum. It was noted that industry best practices recommend periodically rotating audit firms. Historically, the Town has followed this practice by changing firms after three years; however, approval of this contract would result in eight consecutive years of service with the current auditor, Martin Starnes & Associates. The Board discussed concerns regarding the length of time the same firm has conducted the Town’s audits. Following discussion, a motion was made to approve the contract for audit services between the Town and Martin Starnes & Associates.
A decision was made – Approved (3-1)
Commissioner Myers opposed the motion
Editor’s Note –
Fee schedule:
2020-2021 $23,000
2021-2022 $25,150 +$2,150/109%
2022-2023 $36,975 +$11,825/147%
2023-2024 $40,675 +$3,700/110%
2024-2025 $50,430 +$9,755/124%
2025-2026 $48,000 +$3,255/107% (Base Rate: 2024-2025/$44,745)
2026-2027 $50,760 +$2,760/106%
2027-2028 $53,700 +$2,940/106%
7. Discussion and Possible Action to Grant Permission to the Mayor to Sign a Letter in Opposition of the Town of Fuquay-Varina’s Interbasin Transfer Request – Town Manager Chadwick
Agenda Packet – pages 47 – 52
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action to Grant Permission to the Mayor of Manager to Sign a Letter in Opposition of the Town of Fuquay-Varina’s Interbasin Transfer Request
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Board approved Resolution 25-11, Opposing the Fuquay-Varina Interbasin Transfer (IBT) and Request For Additional Comment in December. Our resolution, in additional to multiple others were hand-delivered by the Cape Fear Council of Governments (COG) to the Environmental Management Commission. A group of working professionals has been assembled to develop a follow-up response in the form of a letter that will discuss specific points related to water quality, water quantity impacts of the proposed IBT, several flaws with the environmental study and flaws in the decision-making process for IBTs. Allen Serkin from the COG is requesting that local governments grant permission to the mayor or manager to sign the letter on behalf of the Board once it is completed.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Grant permission to the mayor and/or manager to sign the letter in order to meet the submittal deadline of April 1st.
Public comments regarding river basin transfer plan pour in
It’s been nearly a month since a video first aired of Wilmington’s mayor invoking residents to voice their opposition to one town’s plans to pull millions of gallons of water daily from the Cape Fear River. “Today this vital resource is under threat from growing water-hungry communities upstream,” Mayor Bill Saffo says in the clip as he stands along the city’s downtown Riverwalk. Fuquay-Varina, a town about 30 miles south of Raleigh, wants to move more than 6 million gallons of water each day from the Cape Fear River to the Neuse River, he explains in the video made in collaboration with the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority. “That’s 6 million gallons gone, each day, forever. It is important that you make your voice heard now for your family and for future generations. Add your voice to those of your neighbors and friends who already are telling the state to say no to Fuquay-Varina’s permanent taking of our water,” Saffo concludes. Only a couple of more weeks are left until the public comment period on Fuquay-Varina’s request for an interbasin transfer, or IBT, certificate closes. Maya Holcomb, a Division of Water Resources representative, told members of the state Environmental Management Commission’s Water Allocation Committee last week that she anticipated receiving comments all the way through to the April 1 deadline. In her presentation to the committee Thursday, Holcomb provided an update on the numbers of correspondence she’d received in the days since she initially crafted her report, when the email count was at 283. “But I just keep getting so many emails, which — we’re hearing from the public, that’s great — but I have received an additional 42 emails since this PowerPoint was created last week,” Holcomb said. Holcomb said she had also received 41 resolutions from cities, towns, counties, homebuilders, substations and public utilities. She did not say how many of those resolutions oppose the IBT but instead highlighted what she described as the “newest” issues of concern: loss of water for agricultural purposes, nutrient concentration in the Neuse River Basin, such as those that cause algal blooms, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, hypoxia, drought vulnerability and chemical export of industrial pollutants from the Cape Fear River. Those concerns mirror some of arguments made by dozens of people who spoke out against the transfer during a series of state-hosted public hearings in December. Fuquay-Varina projects that the water supply, from which it currently buys from Raleigh and Harnett and Johnston counties, will fall short of demand by 2030. Under the proposed preferred alternative identified in a draft environmental impact statement for the transfer, Fuquay-Varina would source its entire water supply from a water treatment plant in Sanford, which is in the Cape Fear River Basin. Once water pulled from the Cape Fear River is used by residents and businesses in that town, the treated wastewater would then be discharged into the Neuse River Basin. This would permanently subtract 6.17 million gallons each day from the river flow that currently serves about 900,000 residents of counties, cities, towns and communities from Fayetteville to Wilmington. “Put in perspective, 6.17 (million gallons per day) of raw water from the river is enough to provide treated drinking water to more than 27,000 homes,” according to Cape Fear Public Utility Authority’s website. In the weeks and months leading up to CFPUA’s campaign against Fuquay-Varina’s plan, several local governments and utilities adopted resolutions and sent letters of opposition to the state. New Hanover County, Wilmington and Brunswick County and more than a dozen Brunswick County municipalities have officially gone on record opposing Fuquay-Varina’s request. Holcomb explained last week that, after April 1, state environmental officials will respond to comments on the draft environmental impact statement and then formulate a hearing officers’ report, which will be finalized sometime between July and September. After that, the Environmental Management Commission will determine whether the EIS is technically adequate. Following that determination, the Department of Environmental Quality will issue its record of decision. Another round of public hearings will be held before the EMC makes its final determination. If approved, the transfer would occur after 2031, according to the draft impact statement. Comments may be submitted to Maya Holcomb, Division of Water Resources, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC, 27604, or by email to maya.holcomb@deq.nc.gov.
Read more » click here
Previously reported – December 2025
Resolution 25-11 » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Approval of Resolution 25-11, Resolution Opposing the Fuquay-Varina Interbasin Transfer and Request for Additional Comment
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Representatives from the Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority (LCFWASA) distributed a draft resolution opposing the Fuquay-Varina Interbasin Transfer (IBT) and requesting additional comment. The resolution outlines concerns regarding the Town of Fuquay-Varina ‘s proposal to transfer water from the Cape Fear River Basin to the Neuse River Basin and it requests additional time and opportunities for the impacted Cape Fear Basin communities to review and provide input on the proposed transfer.
Given the potential regional impacts to water availability and future growth, LCFWASA is asking local governing bodies to consider adopting a similar resolution to support this effort.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of resolution opposing the Fuquay-Varina lnterbasin Transfer (IBT) and request for additional comment.
Interbasin Transfer
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has partnered with the City of Sanford to purchase up to 6 million gallons per day (mgd) of finished water from the City to meet the Town’s water supply needs over a 30-year planning period. Finished water will be transferred from the Cape Fear River basin (Lee County) to the Neuse River basin (Wake County). An interbasin transfer is defined as the regulated movement of surface water from one river basin to another. Law does not prohibit transfers but requires that effects of the transfer on the source and receiving basins be quantified prior to the transfer.
The proposed water balance and interbasin transfer (IBT) meet the statutory definition of a transfer per General Statutes 143-215.22G and 215.22L, therefore the Town of Fuquay-Varina must prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, conduct Public Hearings, and submit a petition to the Environmental Management Commission for the IBT Certificate. The process is anticipated to take three to five years.
It’s plain and simple, we oppose the water transfer as requested since it will be taking away water from us. Given the potential regional impacts to water availability and future growth, Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority (LCFWASA) is asking local governing bodies to consider adopting a similar resolution to support opposing the Fuquay-Varina lnterbasin Transfer (IBT) and request for additional comment.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Fight over Cape Fear River water sparks widespread downstream anger
A fast-growing suburb near Raleigh wants to take water from the Cape Fear and then dump it into the Neuse River basin. Downstream users are saying not so fast.
For most of its nearly 190-mile journey through Central and Southeastern North Carolina, the murky Cape Fear River flows slowly and peacefully through a relatively flat landscape as it makes its way from the Piedmont to the coast. But over the past few weeks the river’s waters have been anything but tranquil as local government officials, environmentalists, concerned citizens and regulators tussle over plans by one Triangle community to take water from the river basin to meet the needs of a booming population. While withdrawing water from a river basin isn’t uncommon in North Carolina, it’s what Fuquay-Varina wants to do with the water after its been through the town’s utility systems and used by homes and businesses that’s generating concerns.
What’s the issue?
Fuquay-Varina in Wake County is proposing to partner with Sanford in nearby Lee County to draw up to 6 million gallons per day − enough to fill nine Olympic-sized swimming pools − from the Cape Fear River over the next 30 years to meet its growing population. According to the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, Fuquay-Varina’s population in 2020 was 34,000, and the town added another estimated 12,000 people by the end of 2024. That figure could reach 100,000 by 2050. But while the water will be drawn from the Cape Fear River near Sanford, it will dumped as wastewater into the Neuse River basin in Wake County. “An interbasin transfer is defined as the regulated movement of surface water from one river basin to another,” according to a post on Fuquay-Varina’s website. “Law does not prohibit transfers but requires that effects of the transfer on the source and receiving basins be quantified prior to the transfer.” Right now Fuquay-Varina gets its water from Raleigh and Harnett and Johnston counties. “Long-term water supply solution from current water purveyors is not feasible,” the town stated in a PowerPoint presentation. According to the project’s draft environmental impact statement (EIS), it would be about $200 million cheaper to take the water from the Cape Fear and release it into the Neuse than to send it back into the Cape Fear River basin.
Water supply, environmental concerns
But downstream communities that rely on the Cape Fear for their drinking water needs, including Fayetteville, Wilmington and much of Brunswick County, have raised a host of concerns about the proposal. At a series of meetings earlier this month in Fayetteville and around the Triangle, dozens of people spoke out passionately and many angrily against the proposed water transfer. Opponents’ arguments included concerns over lower water flows in the Cape Fear, especially during periods of extended drought − something that’s expected to occur more frequently thanks to climate change, which could impact downstream utilities from meeting the water needs of their own growing populations. Several speakers also expressed worries that reduced flows could harm potential economic opportunities, especially if a steady flow of water can’t be guaranteed. Roger Shew, an environmental scientist with the University of North Carolina Wilmington, said lower water flows − something that’s happened four times in the Lower Cape Fear since 2000 and prompted water conservation measures twice − also can have significant environmental impacts. That includes potentially harming migratory fish species, some endangered like the pair of sturgeon species found in the river, which require sustained water levels to successfully breed. Reduced water flows also increase the chance for harmful algal blooms and could increase contamination levels in raw water drawn from the Cape Fear, not to mention the ongoing concerns over “forever chemicals” like GenX found in the waterway. Nearly two dozen local governments, utility authorities, environmental groups, and business organizations have passed resolutions opposing the proposed interbasin transfer.
What happens now?
Shew said North Carolina isn’t a stranger to interbasin transfers, and many of the state’s fast-growing metros and counties have implemented them in one form or another. But he said concerns over the long-term impacts of taking water from one basin and dumping back into another one prompted the N.C. General Assembly this year to adopt a moratorium on new water transfers until March 2027. The ban, however, only covers interbasin transfers of 15 million gallons per day or greater. Fuquay-Varina’s proposal is only for a daily transfer of 6.17 million gallons. But Shew said with so little data on the long-term effects of these water movements, they should be carefully scrutinized no matter what their proposed size. “Hopefully the (N.C. Environmental Management Commission) and (N.C. Department of Environmental Quality) will scrutinize these types of transfers to ensure that no negative impacts occur with this proposal or others,” he said. “And the only way to guarantee that is to keep the water in the basin.” At the least, Shew and others have said the state should hold a public hearing on the proposal in the Lower Cape Fear region where Wilmington-area officials and residents can have their say without having to drive two hours inland to air their concerns. “The draft EIS acknowledges that pollution, reduced flows, increased wastewater discharge, stormwater runoff, and flooding currently threaten the Cape Fear River, and these threats may be exacerbated with the (interbasin transfer),” states a Dec. 5 letter the Southern Environmental Law Center, which is representing a slew of environmental groups opposed to the proposal, sent to state regulators. “In sum, we request that DEQ and the EMC schedule a public hearing on the draft EIS for the Fuquay Varina IBT certificate in or around Wilmington to give communities downstream of the transfer point a full opportunity to participate in the public process on this important issue.” As of publication time no additional public hearings had been scheduled. But the state has extended the window to accept written comments until April 1. They can be mailed to Maya Holcomb, Division of Water Resources, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, N.C., 27604, or by email to maya.holcomb@deq.nc.gov.
Read more » click here
Update –
The Board authorized the Mayor and Town Manager to sign a letter expressing opposition to the Town of Fuquay-Varina’s Interbasin Transfer Request.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
8. Discussion and Possible Action on Next Steps in Filling the Vacancy on the Board of Commissioners – Town Clerk Finnell
Agenda Packet – page 53, plus separate packet
BOC Vacancy Resumes » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and Possible Action on Next Steps in Filling the Vacancy on the Board of Commissioners.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Seven applications were received for the commissioner vacancy. The Board needs to determine the next steps in the process.
Previously reported – February 2026
Commissioner Vacancy
Several commissioners have asked about the vacancy and the process to replace. Recommend you discuss at either a special meeting or the March meeting on process of filling the vacant position.
Update –
BOC’s discussed the various ways that they can proceed to fill the vacancy. They seemed to agree that it needs to be filled sooner rather than later. The decision was made to have the staff call for applications now and instructed them to utilize The Board Membership Application form with a request for a copy of a resume. Once they receive applications they will determine how to move forward
THB Newsletter (02/18/26)
Board of Commissioners’ Vacancy
There is currently a vacancy on the Holden Beach Board of Commissioners. If you are a resident and interested in filling the vacancy, please send your resume, along with a completed Application for Board Membership to Heather Finnell at heather@hbtownhall.com or to 110 Rothschild Street, Holden Beach, NC 28462 by March 11th.
Process for Filling Vacant Commissioner Position
§30.11 TERMS OF OFFICE; FILLING OF VACANCIES.
(A) Commissioner shall be two years, both of which begin on the day of first regular meeting in December following their election, except in case either is elected to serve an unexpired term, in which case the newly elected officers shall qualify and commence serving immediately upon the declaration of the result of the election by the Town BOC.
(B) Vacancies shall be filled as provided for in North Carolina General Statute § 160A-63
§160A‑63. Vacancies.
A vacancy that occurs in an elective office of a city shall be filled by appointment of the city council. If the term of the office expires immediately following the next regular city election, or if the next regular city election will be held within 90 days after the vacancy occurs, the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term. Otherwise, a successor shall be elected at the next regularly scheduled city election that is held more than 90 days after the vacancy occurs, and the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall serve only until the elected successor takes office. The elected successor shall then serve the remainder of the unexpired term.
Update –
A total of seven (7) applications were received to fill the Commissioner vacancy. To move forward in the selection process, the Board agreed to interview all applicants. It was determined that all interviews will be conducted during the April Regular Meeting, following the same process used during the previous election. The Board will make a final decision regarding the appointment at a later date.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
9. Discussion and Possible Action to Adopt Resolution 26-04 in Support for the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Redevelopment Project – Commissioner Pate
Agenda Packet – pages 54 – 57, plus separate packet
Resolution 26-04 » click here
Corridor Study » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion/Possible Action to Adopt a Resolution of Support for the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Redevelopment Project as outlined in the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Study dated 10/18/2023 for submission to Brunswick County Board of Commissioners and Secretary of NCDOT .
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
A study was completed in collaboration with Brunswick County GSATS with study having been completed and represented in an attachment, referred to as Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Study (dated 10/18/2023). It was submitted to the Brunswick County Commissioners. The Holden Beach Board of Commissioners have never adopted a position in support of the recommendations outlined in the Study, therefore I would like to ask for adoption of a Resolution of Support for the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Redevelopment Project.
From 2024 / Causeway
Holden Beach Causeway – Facebook
Sometimes change is out of our control but if we recognize it in time, we can help influence change to have a positive outcome. Our community is special and no longer a secret. The area’s population increase is happening at a rapid pace. The Holden Beach Causeway has become insufficient to meet today’s demand. Spend a little time on the Causeway and it is easy to see it is unsafe for pedestrians and vehicles entering and exiting the local businesses. The crash rating on the Causeway is three (3) times higher than the NC state average for similar roads. Since 2018 I have persistently advocated for a study on developing the necessary changes needed on the Holden Beach Causeway. The Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Study was approved and funded in 2019. The study was developed with the influence of the Causeway property owners working with Brunswick County Planning, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Grand Strand Area Transportation Study (GSATS). A special thank you to the Causeway Property Owners who were a part of the Causeway Study Steering Committee. Lyn Holden, Gina Robinson, Steven Parish, Joe Shannon, Andrew Robinson and I dedicated a lot of time working on the study. Communicating with other Causeway property owners and representing what is right for our community, to prevent an unwanted outcome. The steering committee involved Tri-Beach Fire Department in the conversations. Including their opinions on the study’s development to assure they had sufficient access through the Causeway and to the island for emergency response. All headed up by the carefully chosen consulting firm, Bolten and Menk. The consulting firm did an amazing job working with all of the obstacles on the Causeway, consulting with the steering committee and business owners about their concerns of any negative impacts from the project. We are proud to present to you the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Study. Please visit the link below to review the final draft. Considering all of the obstacles and considerations for everyone, the outcome offers a bright future for our community. It also provides a path for sustainability and safety for our Causeway and its businesses, as our area continues to grow.
What happens next?
Chairman to the Brunswick County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner Randy Thompson, has requested an endorsement for the Holden Beach Causeway Project from the Town of Holden Beach. Commissioner Thompson’s position for requesting the Town endorsement is the Causeway is the highway ingress, egress to the island. Next, the study will be presented to the Brunswick County Board of Commissioners for endorsement. Once the study has been endorsed by Brunswick County, the study will go back to the Grand Strand Area Transportation Study for adoption. Once adopted by GSATS, we can begin applying for Funding. It has been a long road to get to this point and we have a long road ahead to receive funding and begin construction. Thank you all for your support for the Holden Beach Causeway Project. We will need your continuous support as we navigate through the next phase of this process. I will keep this page posted as developments are made with the County required endorsements and the road to GSATS adoption.
Jabin Norris president of PROACTIVE Real Estate
For more information » click here
HB Causeway Study Report » click here
THB Newsletter (01/25/24)
Holden Beach Causeway Study
The Grand Strand Area Transportation Study MPO (GSATS) funded a study to improve the Holden Beach Causeway by observing the area and addressing the concerns of Causeway business owners and patrons as well as the community related to vehicular and pedestrian safety, accessibility, right”of”way encroachments, and parking deficiencies. This study provides insight as to how the corridor functions and ideas for future improvements from a transportation and land use perspective.
For more information and to view the study, visit the Brunswick County Planning Department’s website: https://www.brunswickcountync.gov/409/Holden-Beach-Causeway-Transportation-Cor
The Draft Holden Beach Causeway Transportation Study will go to the Brunswick County Board of Commissioners for a public hearing and for their consideration on February 5, 2024, at 3:00 p.m.
Previously reported – February 2023
A popular Brunswick beach road could soon see needed improvements.
Here’s the first step.
A popular Brunswick County road could see much-needed improvements if a project more than four years in the making gets its final go-ahead. Since 2019, Holden Beach residents have pushed local and state leaders to fund a study looking at the Holden Beach Causeway, the business strip on the mainland side of Holden Beach. Now, with a contractor in place and funding squared away, state and local leaders are eager for the study to get underway.
Here’s what to know as officials await the green light to begin.
What will be studied?
The Grand Strand Area Transportation Study (Myrtle Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization) is leading the Holden Beach Causeway Study. The GSATS MPO study area boundary encompasses the northern coast area of South Carolina, including portions of Horry and Georgetown counties, and the southern coastal area of North Carolina including portions of Brunswick County. According to Marc Hoeweler, MPO Director at GSATS, the study will focus primarily on access management by studying existing rights-of-way and driveways and how they can best be structured and ordered for better traffic flow. Hoeweler said the project was prompted by a request from the county. The study would also address pedestrian safety concerns and parking deficiencies. Following its completion, the study would serve as a guide for future road improvements and development along the causeway.
What is the cost?
The $40,000 study will be funded with both federal and local dollars. According to Hoeweler, 80% (or $32,000) will be funded by federal money, while a 20% (or $8,000) local match will be provided by Brunswick County.
What’s the hold up?
According to Brunswick County officials, GSATS is currently working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation to finalize the contract with the consulting firm. Following a “competitive” selection process, Minnesota-based engineering firm Bolton & Menk was selected for the project. Once a final contract is signed by all parties, work on the study will begin. Hoeweler said he expects approval any day now and a kickoff meeting could occur within a week of the contract being signed.
Read more » click here
Update –
The Board considered adoption of a resolution supporting the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor Study and requesting that the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Brunswick County Board of Commissioners pursue funding and provide the required local match for project implementation. The project is estimated at $8,143,000, with federal funding contingent upon a 20% local match from Brunswick County and NCDOT. The Town is requesting both entities move forward with the project and commit the necessary funding to secure federal assistance. Jabin Norris presented information on the corridor study and advocated for Board support. Following discussion, the Board determined it was appropriate to move forward but did not adopt the specific plan as presented. Instead, the Board agreed to submit a letter of support for the redevelopment of the Holden Beach Causeway Corridor. Staff will prepare and submit a letter to Brunswick County Commissioners and NCDOT expressing the Town’s support for the project.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
10. Town Manager Report – Town Manager Chadwick
Agenda Packet – pages 58–59
Town Manager Report » click here
Bryan reviewed the Town Manager Report
Block Q Restrooms & Parking
In process.
Previously reported – November 2025
Grant extension was applied for with the state and timeline has been extended
Ocean Boulevard Stormwater
Meeting is being coordinated with McGill, the USAGE, and the Town
Previously reported – February 2026
Contract is included in February agenda packet
Previously reported – June 2025
The Town was awarded $2.2M in Environmental Infrastructure Disaster Relief Funding for stormwater projects. To get started USACE requires the execution of the Project Partnership Agreement. The Town portion of the 2.2 million dollar project is 25%, which would cost us $550,000. The motion was made to approve the project partnership agreement with the USACE and have the town staff execute the paperwork.
Block Q Master Plan RFQ
Staff met with McGill to narrow the scope for inclusion in contract
Previously reported – February 2026
Discussion and recommendation for a firm on agenda
Block Q Stage Area
Request for Proposals are out for bid
Bids will be returned to staff with a recommendation for approval by commissioners
Previously reported – February 2026
Final specs are completed for distribution in Request for Proposals
Bids will be returned to staff with a recommendation for approval by commissioners
Pier Site
Future Scope of Work discussion TBD in the future
THB Newsletter (04/15/25)
Work has been completed and the pier parking lot and walkways are now open.
Please be mindful not to stand or sit under the pier structure.
NC Resilient Coastal Communities Program
Committee met with engineer and a grant representative to discuss
Previously reported – August 2025
The Town was selected to receive a technical assistance award through the program
ESP Associates has been assigned as our engineer firm and will receive $70,000
Staff will have an orientation session regarding our phase of the program on 09/09Â
Previously reported – April 2025
N.C. Resilient Coastal Communities Program » click here
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management is accepting applications from eligible communities for no-cost technical assistance to complete Phases I and 2 of the Resilient Coastal Communities Program. The motion was made to complete an application to Resilient Coastal Communities Program by the deadline of April 25th, if it is at all possible.
Southeastern Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Resolution is included in March agenda packet
Halstead Park
Working on getting the CAMA permit so contractor can begin work
Pier is closed due to safety until further notice as previously advertised
Previously reported – February 2026
Contractor will begin work the next couple of weeks
Previously reported – January 2026
Scope of work that was previously advertised needs to be changed to include new piles
Pier is closed due to safety until further notice as previously advertised
Lockwood Folly Funding
Congress approved an appropriation for maintenance of Lockwood Folly Inlet
Previously reported – February 2026
Congress approved an appropriation of $900,000 for maintenance of the inlet
Canal Dredging
Plans are being made to dredge canals next winter
THB Newsletter (02/05/26)
In anticipation of a potential dredge event next winter, Coastal Geomatics will begin surveying the canals in mid-February. Their trucks will be seen parked on the side streets.
Ocean Isle Borrow Area
Ocean Isle has requested to expand the Shallotte borrow sight
Fran Way is composing a response for the Town
Ocean Isle seeks to modify permit, nourish beach at east inlet
Ocean Isle Beach hopes to pump tens of thousands of cubic yards of sand onto the beach at the easternmost tip of the island by this spring as an erosion stopgap. The Brunswick County town has asked the Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District for authorization to have up to 70,000 cubic yards of sand placed east of its terminal groin where erosion has been chipping away at the shoreline in front of a luxury neighborhood. The Corps announced late last week that it is accepting public comments through March 8 on the town’s application to modify the federal permit it received in 2016 to build the terminal groin at Shallotte Inlet. As it stands, that permit does not allow sand to be placed east of the terminal groin. A terminal groin is a wall-like structure built perpendicular to the shore at inlets to contain sand in areas with high rates of erosion. Proposed modifications to the permit include placing sand along an 1,875-foot stretch of shoreline at The Pointe, a gated community whose oceanfront property owners have been desperately trying to hold back an encroaching sea. Under the terms of the proposed permit changes, this would be a one-time beach nourishment project. The town is also asking for its permitted sand borrow source in Shallotte Inlet to be expanded from about 83 acres to a little more than 117 acres, to add a new borrow area within the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and be allowed to work outside of the environmental window for dredging from April 30 to June 15. Ocean Isle Beach Town Manager Justin Whiteside said on Tuesday that the town wants to get the modified permit as quickly as possible in hopes that the sand placement project would coincide with a federal dredging project. The Corps announced last September it had awarded a nearly $8.5 million contract to maintenance dredge several areas along the Intracoastal, including at the Shallotte Inlet crossing. Whiteside explained that Ocean Isle Beach anticipates receiving 25,000 cubic yards of sand “that the town is paying for” from the Corps through the inlet crossing project. “The hope is to get this permit modified within the timeframe that the Corps’ contractor is here on site and then we could contract with them possibly to dredge more in that federal channel or go into that inlet borrow area to put that additional sand there,” he said. Whiteside said the town does not yet have an approximate cost of its proposal to nourish the beach east of the terminal groin. Ocean Isle’s east end had for decades been losing ground to chronic erosion, the worst of which occurred along about a mile of ocean shoreline beginning near the inlet. An encroaching ocean claimed homes damaged, destroyed public utilities, and prompted the North Carolina Department of Transportation to abandon state-maintained streets there. To stave off further erosion, the town in 2005 was permitted to install a wall of sandbags to protect private properties from getting swallowed up by the sea. In 2011, Ocean Isle Beach was, along with a handful of other beach communities, allowed to pursue the option of installing a terminal groin at an inlet area after the North Carolina General Assembly repealed a law that banned hardened erosion control structures on the state’s ocean shorelines. Five years later, the town received state and federal approval to build a 750-foot terminal groin. But before construction could begin, the Southern Environmental Law Center in August 2017 filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Audubon Society challenging the Corps’ approval of the project. More than three years passed before the lawsuit, which later included the town, concluded after an appellate court affirmed a lower court’s decision that the Corps fairly considered the alternatives included in an environmental impact statement examining the proposed project. Construction of the $11 million project was completed in the spring of 2022, the same year the final plan for The Pointe, a 44-lot subdivision, was approved for development. By fall 2025, The Pointe’s oceanfront properties were suffering significant erosion. Last November, the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission unanimously agreed to grant permission to the owners of eight lots in that neighborhood to install larger than typically allowed sandbag structures waterward of their land. Whiteside said Tuesday that those sandbags had not been installed. Sand in the area east of the terminal groin, he said, appears to be “recovering a little bit.” “We think over the past month and a half or so that we’ve gained, just looking at aerial photographs, approximately 5,000 cubic yards of sand that’s deposited east of the groin, so some of the beach is building back up in that area,” Whiteside said. He explained that in 2022 the town’s federal beach nourishment project took place in conjunction with the construction of the terminal groin. “The dredger came through and we had a huge spit on the east end of the island and that contractor came through and just dredged right through that spit and took it down to a negative 15-foot elevation,” Whiteside said. “It’s kind of filled back in now and we’re thinking that’s why we’re seeing the growth back east of the groin. We’re hoping this shows that that’s some of what contributed to it, that it was maybe our own nourishment project through the Corps.” “But, in the meantime, we know this is a short-term solution that we’ve got to figure out some type of long-term solution to, so our engineer firm is going to be doing some modeling to see what kind of modifications, if any, need to take place to the existing groin,” he continued. Comments on the proposed project should refer the permit application number (SAW-2011-01241) and may be submitted to the Corps electronically through the Regulatory Request System at https://rrs.usace.army.mil/rrs or by email to Tyler Crumbley at tyler.a.crumbley2@usace.army.mil . Written comments may be mailed to Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Attention: Tyler Crumbley, 69 Darlington Ave., Wilmington, NC 28403. The Corps will consider written requests for a public hearing to be held to consider the proposed application modifications.
Read more » click here
Pier
Special Meeting has been scheduled in April to discuss
Employee Updates
Steve Barger has been selected as police chief
Frank Dilworth is the interim police chief
Paving Bids
Released bids for work to be done on Swordfish and Tuna
Editor’s Note –
In 2015 the Board implemented a $0.01 tax increase specifically dedicated to street paving and maintenance. That one-cent increase generates approximately $240,202 in annual tax revenue, which is earmarked solely for street paving and maintenance and is already included in the budget. Given that this dedicated tax generates over $200,000 each year, it raises an important question: why are we only spending $100,000 annually on paving? If the revenue is specifically designated for this purpose, it would seem reasonable to expect that the funds collected should be used accordingly to maintain and improve our streets. At a minimum, there should be a clear explanation for why only about half of the dedicated revenue is being used while the condition of our streets continues to deteriorate.
Previously reported – November 2015
Streets Condition Survey Report is a planning document. We have a total of 12.8 paved asphalt roadways with @40% of the roads in need of maintenance. Subject streets are Class A (low volume) roads the cost estimate is for pavement repair only, with the costs being variable. The total estimated costs are a whopping $1,200,000. Surface evaluation was done rating each street and prioritizing the work that needs to be done. Recommended we address it with a ten-year game plan, budgeting accordingly, tackling it on a yearly basis. Understandably we can expect our streets to continue to degrade while costs will continue to go up.
Previously reported – November 2024
Maintenance Needs
Of the 12.8 miles of streets inspected, approximately 25% are in need of maintenance. The survey indicated a total estimated maintenance need for plant mix resurfacing of $1,021,874. This represents an average of $72,350 per mile for the entire town street system. It should be noted that this cost estimate is for pavement repair only. Additional costs can be incurred for drainage improvements, administration, utility adjustments, work zone traffic control, and other items. Please note that these costs are variable and can increase the total project cost significantly.
Pavement Condition Rating / PCR Listing
The type and amount of distress that was observed on each street was used to obtain a Pavement Condition Rating (PCR). A 66 – 80 rating indicates a general condition of just fair.
The following streets had the lowest PCR:
-
-
Sand Dollar/ 73- Heron / 75
- Swordfish / 75
- Tuna / 75
- Lois / 77
- Lumberton / 77
- Charlotte / 78
- Heron Landing / 80
-
Editor’s note –
2025 / Sand Dollar and Heron Drive at a cost of $149,500
2024 / High Point Street at a cost of $115,250
2023 / Tide Ridge Drive, Pointe West Drive and Ranger Street at a cost of $126,000
2022 / Seagull Drive at a cost of $208,150
. • The cost was split between the Town and the properties on Seagull
2021 / BAE from Rothschild to Ferry at a cost of $123,000
2020 / BAW from High Point to Rothschild at a cost of $111,250
Dredging
USACE maintenance work in the inlets utilizing dredge spoil area on Sailfish
Bike Lane
Street sweeping scheduled next week
Bike Lane Maintenance
A significant number of locations of the bike lane have sand, gravel, rocks, and broken glass from recycling trucks. Therefore, it is UNSAFE especially for young and/or inexperienced bicycle riders. Not a good situation, if someone goes down they could easily slide into the traffic lane, which would have some serious negative consequences. NCDOT only provides maintenance service a few times a year. Standard protocol is for the town to take care of the bike lane with their staff. This is a safety issue that needs to be addressed, sooner rather than later. Do not think that quarterly maintenance is really adequate although it is better than nothing.
Manager’s Report Change
I would like to hand out my report on the night of meeting for the most current information. Heather can then include it in the meeting synopsis she sends to the public.
Bryan stated that the situation is fluid, and I understand that some things may change. However, the vast majority of the material remains consistent from month to month. In reality, very little of the report changes. Providing the report in advance ensures that both the Board and the public have adequate time to review the information and become familiar with the items being presented. Removing that opportunity reduces transparency and limits the ability for informed discussion.
Previously reported – February 2026
Beginning next month the report will not be distributed in the agenda packet
But it will be included in the THB Newsletter – Board of Commissioners Meeting Recap
Previously reported – April 2024
Discussion and Possible Action on Placing the Town Manager’s Report on the Board of Commissioners’ Meeting Agenda – Mayor Pro Tem Myers and Commissioner Thomas
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Discussion and possible action on placing the Town Manager’s report on the BOC meeting agenda.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The Town Manager typically provides the Commissioners with an update on the status of key projects and programs
This information is typically provided to the Commissioners in written format at the beginning of the BOC meeting and discussed by the Town Manager after the Public Comments towards the end of the meeting.
Moving this report up onto the regular agenda similar to the Police Chief, Building Inspector, and Finance Director reports will allow for more discussion and possible action. It will also increase transparency by including the report information in the meeting packet for the public to review prior to the meeting .
Mayor Pro Tem Myers would like to have the Town Manager report be added to the agenda. They danced around the timeliness of the report if it is submitted early enough to be in included in the agenda packet. The Board decided to add Town Manager written report to the monthly agenda starting next month.
A decision was made – Approved (4-1)
Commissioner Smith opposed the motion
Update –
The Town Manager’s report was reviewed and discussed. A motion was made to provide the Manager’s report directly to Commissioners during the meeting, rather than including it in the meeting packet. After the meeting, the report will be posted on the Town’s website for public access.
A decision was made – Approved (3-1)
Commissioner Myers opposed the motion
In Case You Missed It
Dog Reminders
Please remember that any time your dog is off your premise, they must be on a leash, cord or chain at all times. Also, dog owners must remove dog waste immediately after it is deposited by the dog when on public property or any private property, including vacant lots, without the permission of the private property owner. Dog waste stations are conveniently located throughout the island.
Emergency Operations Center
The EOC building is being used by Tri-Beach Fire Department while they renovate their fire station on Sabbath Home
National Flood Insurance Program: Reauthorization
Congress must periodically renew the NFIP’s statutory authority to operate. On February 3, 2026, the president signed legislation passed by Congress that extends the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP’s) authorization to September 30, 2026.
News from Town of Holden Beach
The town sends out emails of events, news, agendas, notifications and emergency information. If you would like to be added to their mailing list, please go to their web site to complete your subscription to the Holden Beach E-Newsletter.
For more information » click here
Upcoming Events
Family Nighttime Easter Egg Hunt
The Town will hold its annual nighttime Easter Egg Hunt on Good Friday, April 3rd
2026 Concert Schedule
The 2026 concert schedule is now available. Enjoy the sounds of summer at our FREE concert series starting May 24th. Concerts are held on Sundays at 6:30 p.m. throughout the summer.
Click here to view the schedule.
11. Closed Session Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a)(3), To Consider the Qualifications, Competence, Performance of a Public Officer or Employee and North Carolina General Statute 143-318.11(a)(1), To Prevent the Disclosure of Privileged Information
No decision was made – No action taken
General Comments
BOC’s Meeting
The Board of Commissioners’ next Regular Meeting is scheduled on the third Tuesday of the month, April 21st
Budget Season
They have a proposed budget meeting schedule as follows:
-
-
- April 10th Expenditures
- May 1st Revenues
- May 5th Revenues & Expenditures
- June 4th Budget Message Discussion
-
Budget Calendar
The Town Manager’s proposed budget is due by June 1st
Commissioners must adopt budget no later than June 30th for the next fiscal year
Adopting the annual budget is a primary responsibility of the Board.
It’s not like they don’t have anything to work on …
The following five (5) items are what’s In the Works/Loose Ends queue:
-
-
-
- 2019 – Dog Park
- 2021 – Pier Properties Project
- 2021 – Rights-of-Way
- 2021 – Block Q Project/Carolina Avenue
- 2023 – Fire Station Project
-
-
The definition of loose ends is a fragment of unfinished business or a detail that is not yet settled or explained, which is the current status of these items. All of these items were started and then put on hold, and they were never put back in the queue. This Board needs to continue working on them and move these items to closure.
.
Lost in the Sauce
.
From 2025 / Block Q Restroom Facility
Previously reported – March 2025
Consideration and Possible Action to Award Contract for the Construction of the Restroom Facility and Associated Parking/Sidewalks at Block Q – Interim Town Manager Ferguson
Supplement – Contract » click here
ISSUE/ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and possible action to award contract for the construction of the restroom facility and associated parking/sidewalks at Block Q.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The bids for the project were due back on
January 14th. A second bid opening was held January 28th due to an insufficient number on January 14th. This project will include modular stormwater, sitework prep, and construction for the bathrooms and associated parking/sidewalks. Recommendation for award of contract.
TOWN MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Award contract to responsive bidder. Direct interim town manager to sign contract and complete all associated paperwork.
The most responsive bid after two rounds of advertising for the Block Q restroom and parking facility is $543,200. It falls within the budget for the project. The bid proposal outlines one hundred calendar days to completion.
Suggested Motion:
Approve the contract for Kowen Construction and authorize the interim manager to execute the associated paperwork.
Update –
The Board approved the contract with Kowen Construction for the Block Q restroom and parking facility in the amount of $543,200. Work is expected to be completed within one hundred (100) calendar days from the commencement of the work. Motion was made to award the contract for the construction of the restroom facility on Block Q authorize Town Manager to execute the associated paperwork.
A decision was made – Approved unanimously
Editor’s Note –
There will be a Ground Breaking ceremony on June 4th at 10:00am
The bathroom on Block Q is scheduled to be completed by August 20th
Grant extension was applied for with the state and timeline has been extended
Completion date has been pushed back at least a half dozen times already
It’s one year later and project has still not been completed
Hurricane Season
For more information » click here.
Be prepared – have a plan!
No matter what a storm outlook is for a given year,
vigilance and preparedness is urged.
Do you enjoy this newsletter?
Then please forward it to a friend!
Lou’s Views . HBPOIN
. • Gather and disseminate information
. • Identify the issues and determine how they affect you
. • Act as a watchdog
. • Grass roots monthly newsletter since 2008